Introduction of the book "Good Bye AIDS! Did it ever exist?"

When historians look back at our time, they will probably note that the sexual revolution, as a major contribution to the broader movement for human liberation in the 20th century, definitely came to an end in 1984 when the concept of the lethal sexually transmitted 'AIDS' was introduced. Not only did it restrict love, it brought in a disastrous and constant fear. The impact on society was huge.

They will find evidence that after this thousands of people all over the world lost their jobs, their dreams, their human rights. Millions of others who were already living on the edge of death were given the ‘coup de grace.’ It was called a ‘plague,’ but this was a massive delusion.

The mass media controlled by a powerful establishment, as experienced in my life, looms large in the background of this story. If we are to truly understand the problems we face, we have to be aware that the restricted information they provide can distort our peception of reality.

It is said that a cure for 'AIDS' cannot be found, but I was 'HIV-positive' for 10 years, had full-blown 'AIDS' for another 12 years and have now become perfectly fine again without any doctor's intervention or medication. My story coincides with the story of 'AIDS' up until now, so I present these stories together to illuminate the true dimensions of 'AIDS'. It is not everlasting or necessary and, to be more precise, it expired before me. How could that happen?

According to the official theory of AIDS that I once believed in, I was doomed to an early death. Actually, I was a dead person for 22 years since there are two kinds of death, the real and the announced one. The latter you carry inside for the rest of your life.

I was researching it as much as possible but for a long while found not a hint that there might be another view of AIDS. However, eventually the fact that I had not met my male heterosexual equivalent during the ten years that I spent going in and out of the hospitals led me to question the sexual transmission dogma and to explore the case deeper on the Internet. I needed an explanation. The unthinkable result was that I came to discover a whole hidden part of the 'AIDS' story that turned the topic upside down. It took me another year to handle the new information and to take an absolutely logical decision: to stop the therapy and 'AIDS' consultations at the age 42, on the 23rd of April 2007. I then began to return to where I was in 1985; to the strong, healthy and optimistic person I was before.

Was it deadly disease that I experienced or a deadly deception? The whole 'AIDS' story has shadowy origins, almost at every step. The normal scientific process was bypassed on the 23rd of April 1984 when the discovery of the 'AIDS' virus was proclaimed to the world weeks before the research data was published and thus before it could be verified by scientists. It was presented as a success of American science that dispelled the fear enshrouding AIDS, mostly due to unreliable epidemiological data gathered from heavy recreational drug users who were far more likely to blame sex than drug usage, since the latter was illegal.

Of course, if a person struggles with drug abuse, chronic heroin, crack addiction or alcoholism, they are also likely to be malnourished. Malnutrition itself is the quickest, most reliable, universal, hundred-percent perfect way of leading to an immune system collapse. No need to invoke a virus.

However, the whole thing was called “AIDS” and attributed to a virus named ‘HIV.’

For instance, the first 'AIDS' cases were described, according official reports,¹ in the period October 1980 - May 1981 in 5 young men, all active homosexuals, from 3 different hospitals in Los Angeles, California. Only two of them reported having frequent homosexual contacts with various partners. All 5 reported using inhalant drugs and 1 reported injection drug abuse. The patients did not know each other and had no known common contacts or knowledge of sexual partners who had had similar illnesses.

Nevertheless, a virus was later blamed for their sickness and said to be sexually transmitted.

The 'AIDS' concept then became a greenhouse for complacent scientists who work in an artificial environment, with new criteria, without any real controls, but with much prestige and social status. The syndrome became beneficial to many social groups and, after the launching of the 'AIDS' drugs onto the market, it rose to prominence as an industry with excessive profits.

There is no room for questioning in the 'AIDS' world. Even though about 200 billion dollars has been spent so far on research, the 'HIV/AIDS' theory has failed to produced a cure or a vaccine. The uncritical adherence to the 'HIV' theory continues despite the consequences and despite the fact that more than 2500 professionals (mostly scientists, researchers, doctors and journalists), have shown with solid scientific evidences that this theory is not valid. The latter are discredited a priori as "dissidents" or "denialists" by the 'AIDS' establishment and their questioning is not exposed in the mass media.

However, reliable evidence needs to be present before anyone is told that they are infected with a deadly virus. The patient should also be given a thorough briefing about the subject so he or she can give a proper "informed consent" before taking HIV test that might proclaim one's moribund state, and certainly before beginning treatment for the purported illness.

We do not get that in the case of 'HIV/AIDS'. There is no reliable evidence for the existence of the virus, nor for its pathogenic state, nor its transmission through sexual contact, nor its detection with any test.

I have been considered to be infected with that ‘deadly virus’ for 24 years, from the first year that the ‘HIV’ test became available, 1985. What would I have done differently if I knew then what I learned two decades later? Let’s examine this together, for I believe I was arbitrarily condemned to an early death sentence, as is now also happening every day to many others.

Personally, I did not receive adequate information about this newly arrived syndrome nor did I have knowledge of the political and economical interests involved, nor the censorship of the critics of the AIDS theory. I only felt the cultural taboo surrounding the disease.

I still have not come to terms with myself after my period of 'AIDS' and it is one of the goals of this book to help me do so. I told my friends for years, reported in my first two books, and repeatedly said, during interviews for the press and TV, that I had first learned in 1995 of my infection with the 'HIV' virus.

That is not exactly the case. The truth is that my forthcoming death was announced to me in 1985 when I was 20 years old. The doctors' advice at that time was not to speak a word of it to others for my own good and I followed their directions. It was costly to me, especially lying to everyone at home, but, believing it was necessary, I could only try to remove it from my mind as best as possible. "You kept it from me an entire year?" my mother asked me painfully when she finally learned the truth in 1996. I was unable to tell her, "I kept it from you eleven years."

When I began my HIVwave.gr web page, wrote my first two books and started giving interviews, I was an 'AIDS' patient taking medication who had already caused much despair to her family. I could not imagine creating any more, for my father had died bitter and so I was determined to hold on to my secret forever.

When I discarded the 'AIDS' medication, I realized that I was not going to die despite all predictions and this enraged me. I was angered for the years of silence, for all that I did unwillingly and for all those ugly things that I could not get rid of – even though I was now doing perfectly fine. Revealing the truth was much harder than quitting the 'AIDS' pills. In my opinion, that is the definition of the so-called plague of the century: lie upon lie, stress upon stress, trap upon trap, much too much for one person to handle. One's mind can be deadly and yet at the same time be emancipating.

Τhe goal of writing this book was also for me to better understand how that universal deception occurred and why it is still alive, though I was lucky enough to escape from its deathly grip before it killed me. My AIDS-patient story alternates with my discoveries at every stage. I hope I can now offer a better "informed consent" to the 'HIV positive' conscripts.

In the first chapter, "What I should not do," I narrate how my life was up until 1985, how perfect everything was and what unsuspecting people I would have to wound by telling them I was bearing the HIV virus. Unless, of course, I kept it a secret. I changed none of my plans and went on to make progress in my studies and in my professional life, although feeling something inside me was broken. In the second chapter, "What was diagnosed for me," I tell how my second positive diagnosis took place in 1995, marking the beginning of my life as an 'AIDS' patient. Apart from again reporting me HIV antibody positive, they detected a "possible" pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection and low T4 cell count, a condition the doctors assessed meant I now needed 'AIDS' medication. It was a critical decision in which I was not given any room to choose. In the third chapter, "The deleterious side effects of the prescribed therapy", I tell what happpened to me while I took the pills from 1995 until 2007; that is – a series of life-threatening illnesses. It was Dante's Inferno at home and at the hospital.

In the fourth chapter, "How I survived," I tell how I got a breath of fresh air with the creation of my web page, HIVwave.gr, and emails from a Canadian who never found any reliable evidence for 'AIDS' transmission although he was studying biology at McGill University when the discovery of 'HIV' was announced. From the start of our relationship, he showered me with critical information, hoping for my salvation, while a Greek-American scientist, Dr. Maniotis from Chicago, gave me clear instructions on how to cease taking these medications.

In the fifth chapter, "Total supervision by the 'AIDS' establishment”, I am overcome by feeling that I am practically criminal and surely dangerous because I no longer accept the classic model of an 'AIDS' patient. I understand how mind-terrorism and taboo mentality are cultivated in the media, by doctors, medical students, activists, each one of us; this being revealed to me by a series of arbitrary events over the final three year period.

In the sixth chapter, "How I regained control of my health," I start building a new life in a world with alternative realities, with new doctors and friends that I could trust.

In the seventh chapter, “How I regained control of my life”, I begin posing questions to all I think responsible, speaking more freely in my interviews, meeting willing accomplices along the way, learning of court trials in other countries where the HIV/AIDS concept was questionned, and preparing myself for my return to the world, this time with my own rules.

My long journey proved to be educational. I thank all those I met along the way who somehow managed to widen my horizons. Some are famous and others left anonymous in the text as they requested. Some doctors felt they might damage their career if they were identified as giving me this information, so I have altered their names. I also give only the initials of my 'AIDS' doctors in order to protect them, in the 'AIDS' ambiguous way.

When historians look back at our time, they will probably note that the sexual revolution, as a major contribution to the broader movement for human liberation in the 20th century, definitely came to an end in 1984 when the concept of the lethal sexually transmitted 'AIDS' was introduced. Not only did it restrict love, it brought in a disastrous and constant fear. The impact on society was huge.

They will find evidence that after this thousands of people all over the world lost their jobs, their dreams, their human rights. Millions of others who were already living on the edge of death were given the ‘coup de grace.’ It was called a ‘plague,’ but this was a massive delusion.

The mass media controlled by a powerful establishment, as experienced in my life, looms large in the background of this story. If we are to truly understand the problems we face, we have to be aware that the restricted information they provide can distort our peception of reality.

It is said that a cure for 'AIDS' cannot be found, but I was 'HIV-positive' for 10 years, had full-blown 'AIDS' for another 12 years and have now become perfectly fine again without any doctor's intervention or medication. My story coincides with the story of 'AIDS' up until now, so I present these stories together to illuminate the true dimensions of 'AIDS'. It is not everlasting or necessary and, to be more precise, it expired before me. How could that happen?

According to the official theory of AIDS that I once believed in, I was doomed to an early death. Actually, I was a dead person for 22 years since there are two kinds of death, the real and the announced one. The latter you carry inside for the rest of your life.

I was researching it as much as possible but for a long while found not a hint that there might be another view of AIDS. However, eventually the fact that I had not met my male heterosexual equivalent during the ten years that I spent going in and out of the hospitals led me to question the sexual transmission dogma and to explore the case deeper on the Internet. I needed an explanation. The unthinkable result was that I came to discover a whole hidden part of the 'AIDS' story that turned the topic upside down. It took me another year to handle the new information and to take an absolutely logical decision: to stop the therapy and 'AIDS' consultations at the age 42, on the 23rd of April 2007. I then began to return to where I was in 1985; to the strong, healthy and optimistic person I was before.

Was it deadly disease that I experienced or a deadly deception? The whole 'AIDS' story has shadowy origins, almost at every step. The normal scientific process was bypassed on the 23rd of April 1984 when the discovery of the 'AIDS' virus was proclaimed to the world weeks before the research data was published and thus before it could be verified by scientists. It was presented as a success of American science that dispelled the fear enshrouding AIDS, mostly due to unreliable epidemiological data gathered from heavy recreational drug users who were far more likely to blame sex than drug usage, since the latter was illegal.

Of course, if a person struggles with drug abuse, chronic heroin, crack addiction or alcoholism, they are also likely to be malnourished. Malnutrition itself is the quickest, most reliable, universal, hundred-percent perfect way of leading to an immune system collapse. No need to invoke a virus.

However, the whole thing was called “AIDS” and attributed to a virus named ‘HIV.’

For instance, the first 'AIDS' cases were described, according official reports,¹ in the period October 1980 - May 1981 in 5 young men, all active homosexuals, from 3 different hospitals in Los Angeles, California. Only two of them reported having frequent homosexual contacts with various partners. All 5 reported using inhalant drugs and 1 reported injection drug abuse. The patients did not know each other and had no known common contacts or knowledge of sexual partners who had had similar illnesses.

Nevertheless, a virus was later blamed for their sickness and said to be sexually transmitted.

The 'AIDS' concept then became a greenhouse for complacent scientists who work in an artificial environment, with new criteria, without any real controls, but with much prestige and social status. The syndrome became beneficial to many social groups and, after the launching of the 'AIDS' drugs onto the market, it rose to prominence as an industry with excessive profits.

There is no room for questioning in the 'AIDS' world. Even though about 200 billion dollars has been spent so far on research, the 'HIV/AIDS' theory has failed to produced a cure or a vaccine. The uncritical adherence to the 'HIV' theory continues despite the consequences and despite the fact that more than 2500 professionals (mostly scientists, researchers, doctors and journalists), have shown with solid scientific evidences that this theory is not valid. The latter are discredited a priori as "dissidents" or "denialists" by the 'AIDS' establishment and their questioning is not exposed in the mass media.

However, reliable evidence needs to be present before anyone is told that they are infected with a deadly virus. The patient should also be given a thorough briefing about the subject so he or she can give a proper "informed consent" before taking HIV test that might proclaim one's moribund state, and certainly before beginning treatment for the purported illness.

We do not get that in the case of 'HIV/AIDS'. There is no reliable evidence for the existence of the virus, nor for its pathogenic state, nor its transmission through sexual contact, nor its detection with any test.

I have been considered to be infected with that ‘deadly virus’ for 24 years, from the first year that the ‘HIV’ test became available, 1985. What would I have done differently if I knew then what I learned two decades later? Let’s examine this together, for I believe I was arbitrarily condemned to an early death sentence, as is now also happening every day to many others.

Personally, I did not receive adequate information about this newly arrived syndrome nor did I have knowledge of the political and economical interests involved, nor the censorship of the critics of the AIDS theory. I only felt the cultural taboo surrounding the disease.

I still have not come to terms with myself after my period of 'AIDS' and it is one of the goals of this book to help me do so. I told my friends for years, reported in my first two books, and repeatedly said, during interviews for the press and TV, that I had first learned in 1995 of my infection with the 'HIV' virus.

That is not exactly the case. The truth is that my forthcoming death was announced to me in 1985 when I was 20 years old. The doctors' advice at that time was not to speak a word of it to others for my own good and I followed their directions. It was costly to me, especially lying to everyone at home, but, believing it was necessary, I could only try to remove it from my mind as best as possible. "You kept it from me an entire year?" my mother asked me painfully when she finally learned the truth in 1996. I was unable to tell her, "I kept it from you eleven years."

When I began my HIVwave.gr web page, wrote my first two books and started giving interviews, I was an 'AIDS' patient taking medication who had already caused much despair to her family. I could not imagine creating any more, for my father had died bitter and so I was determined to hold on to my secret forever.

When I discarded the 'AIDS' medication, I realized that I was not going to die despite all predictions and this enraged me. I was angered for the years of silence, for all that I did unwillingly and for all those ugly things that I could not get rid of – even though I was now doing perfectly fine. Revealing the truth was much harder than quitting the 'AIDS' pills. In my opinion, that is the definition of the so-called plague of the century: lie upon lie, stress upon stress, trap upon trap, much too much for one person to handle. One's mind can be deadly and yet at the same time be emancipating.

Τhe goal of writing this book was also for me to better understand how that universal deception occurred and why it is still alive, though I was lucky enough to escape from its deathly grip before it killed me. My AIDS-patient story alternates with my discoveries at every stage. I hope I can now offer a better "informed consent" to the 'HIV positive' conscripts.

In the first chapter, "What I should not do," I narrate how my life was up until 1985, how perfect everything was and what unsuspecting people I would have to wound by telling them I was bearing the HIV virus. Unless, of course, I kept it a secret. I changed none of my plans and went on to make progress in my studies and in my professional life, although feeling something inside me was broken. In the second chapter, "What was diagnosed for me," I tell how my second positive diagnosis took place in 1995, marking the beginning of my life as an 'AIDS' patient. Apart from again reporting me HIV antibody positive, they detected a "possible" pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection and low T4 cell count, a condition the doctors assessed meant I now needed 'AIDS' medication. It was a critical decision in which I was not given any room to choose. In the third chapter, "The deleterious side effects of the prescribed therapy", I tell what happpened to me while I took the pills from 1995 until 2007; that is – a series of life-threatening illnesses. It was Dante's Inferno at home and at the hospital.

In the fourth chapter, "How I survived," I tell how I got a breath of fresh air with the creation of my web page, HIVwave.gr, and emails from a Canadian who never found any reliable evidence for 'AIDS' transmission although he was studying biology at McGill University when the discovery of 'HIV' was announced. From the start of our relationship, he showered me with critical information, hoping for my salvation, while a Greek-American scientist, Dr. Maniotis from Chicago, gave me clear instructions on how to cease taking these medications.

In the fifth chapter, "Total supervision by the 'AIDS' establishment”, I am overcome by feeling that I am practically criminal and surely dangerous because I no longer accept the classic model of an 'AIDS' patient. I understand how mind-terrorism and taboo mentality are cultivated in the media, by doctors, medical students, activists, each one of us; this being revealed to me by a series of arbitrary events over the final three year period.

In the sixth chapter, "How I regained control of my health," I start building a new life in a world with alternative realities, with new doctors and friends that I could trust.

In the seventh chapter, “How I regained control of my life”, I begin posing questions to all I think responsible, speaking more freely in my interviews, meeting willing accomplices along the way, learning of court trials in other countries where the HIV/AIDS concept was questionned, and preparing myself for my return to the world, this time with my own rules.

My long journey proved to be educational. I thank all those I met along the way who somehow managed to widen my horizons. Some are famous and others left anonymous in the text as they requested. Some doctors felt they might damage their career if they were identified as giving me this information, so I have altered their names. I also give only the initials of my 'AIDS' doctors in order to protect them, in the 'AIDS' ambiguous way.

---