Memorial web site for Elisa Jane Scovill, daughter of Christine Maggiore What Really Happened to Eliza Jane? (justiceforej.com) LA County Coroner Says AIDS – Pathological Evidence Points to Amoxicillin.
-----
Commentary on the death of Eliza Jane Scovill: Is an Amoxicillin adverse reaction the 47th AIDS-defining indicator disease?
By Dr Andrew Maniotis
Abstract:
Eliza Jane Scovill was a 3 1/2
year-old child who died in a hospital emergency room 36 hours after
imbibing amoxicillin. She had never been exposed to amoxicillin or
any other beta-lactams before. An autopsy was performed and “no
cause of death” was found by the Los Angeles County coroner¢s
office where her case had been referred. Approximately one week after
the autopsy, the coroner¢s office learned of her parents¢
unorthodox views on HIV and AIDS and the testing history of the
mother (inconclusive, positive, inconclusive, positive, negative,
positive, and now consistently positive). Rather than ordering a
second analysis, another medical examiner (James K. Ribe) not
originally assigned to the case was "brought in to help resolve
the case," and revised autopsy findings were released claiming
Eliza Jane died of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and “HIV
encephalopathy.” I present information in this commentary that
indicates Eliza Jane's symptoms during her crisis period, the
similarities of these symptoms to amoxicillin package inserts, and
descriptions of delayed reactions in the medical literature, do not
support an "AIDS" diagnosis. The fact that she had 10,800
lymphocytes/µl at the time of her death as measured by the hospital
indicates that she had more than the normal numbers of lymphocytes,
casting doubt on any diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia,
a disease indisputably associated with immune suppression.
The facts of the case, and the reaction of AIDS proponents to these
facts, are discussed in the context of rational versus empirical
approaches in medicine with the hope that other children and families
might be spared from a similar tragic, experience.
SEQUENCE
OF EVENTS SURROUDING THE DEATH.
As described by her parents, pre-school teachers,
pediatricians, neighbors, and family friends, Eliza Jane
Scovill lived a happy, and healthy life for 3 ½ years, free of
illness (medical records note only a diaper rash in 2001, a cold the
same year, and chicken pox in 2002) or medical interventions. On
April 30, 2005, Eliza Jane presented to one of her two local
pediatricians with a cough and upper respiratory infection.
In the weeks that followed, three
pediatricians examined her and
noted that Eliza Jane's lungs were clear on April 30th
(Dr Paul Fleiss), May 5th (Dr
Jay Gordon) and May 8th (Dr
Philip Incao). They noted that she appeared to be healthy, except for
fluid in her ear, for which non-pharmaceutical remedies were
prescribed. On May 14th, in a follow-up to the May 8th
visit, Dr. Incao found that her lungs were clear, but noted redness
in addition to fluid in her right eardrum. He prescribed 400mg of
amoxicillin twice a day to the beta-lactam-naïve child (1).
After the second dose of
amoxicillin on May 15, she vomited several times, and she became
agitated. Her mother noticed that the child¢s face became pale.
Following the fourth dose, Eliza Jane's father stated that Eliza Jane
was not looking well, seemed to be deteriorating, and was
cold to the touch. She was agitated
and ran a low fever. During a call to Incao to report these symptoms,
the child fell unconscious and stopped breathing. Her parents called
911 and no pulse could be felt by the emergency technicians that
arrived at the home or by the admitting physicians at the emergency
room at Valley Presbyterian Hospital (VPH) where she was taken by
ambulance (1, 2).
Upon admission to the ER at Valley
Presbyterian Hospital (VPH), her abdomen was noticeably protruded
(2).
On May 16th, 2005, thirty-six hours after imbibing the first dose of
amoxicillin, and after having had consumed four doses of amoxicillin
(1.6 gm), and an undisclosed antibiotic at the hospital given during
attempts at CPR, Eliza Jane died of cardiopulmonary arrest, despite
numerous attempts to revive her (2).
The reason why such a young and
formerly healthy child¢s heart should stop suddenly could not be
explained by the hospital. The case was referred to the Los Angeles
County Coroner¢s office. On May 18th an autopsy
was performed. The medical examiner phoned the family following the
autopsy to report that no cause of death was apparent (Christine
Maggiore, personal communication).
CORONERS
LEARN ABOUT ELIZA JANE'S MOTHER.
Sometime between the family¢s communication with the
ME the week of May 25 regarding the release of the child¢s body to
a mortuary and a memorial service held on May 29, the coroner¢s
office became aware that Eliza Jane's mother wrote a book challenging
conventional thinking on "HIV" and "AIDS" and is
an outspoken critic of the HIV = AIDS paradigm. More than a decade
earlier, starting in 1992 in a series of standard “HIV tests,”
Eliza Jane's mother, Christine Maggiore, tested inconclusive
(first test), positive (second test), inconclusive (third test),
positive (fourth test), negative (fifth test), and positive (sixth
test). (3). According to the doctor who ordered the third,
fourth and fifth tests, Maggiore did not fit into an “AIDS risk
group." Since 1994, Maggiore has been interviewed numerous times
by television and other media about her experiences and viewpoints
regarding "HIV" and "AIDS."
To better understand her own positive diagnosis,
Maggiore researched and wrote a well-referenced book on the subject
of HIV and AIDS and about her experiences in coping with her
asymptomatic and inconsistent diagnosis (3). She also founded
a non-profit organization, Alive & Well AIDS Alternatives, to
help others gather factual information about an HIV positive or AIDS
diagnosis. Last year, Maggiore's partner of 9 years, Robin Scovill,
who is Eliza Jane's father and an award winning film-maker (Special
Jury Prize at the AFI Los Angeles International Film Festival for his
documentary "The Other Side of AIDS") tested sero-negative
three times.
Scovill¢s documentary is
comprised of a series of interviews with a variety of scientific and
medical experts including Dr Kary Mullis, the Nobel Laureate who
invented PCR (polymerase chain reaction) used to determine "HIV
viral load." Other scientists, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, a
member of the National Academy, also are interviewed in the film
about the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of action of
antiretroviral and protease inhibitors, as well as the accuracy of
"HIV" test kits one scientist in the film helped develop. A
physician with the US military, a Professor of Nursing, and several
people who have been “living with HIV" for years without
anti-retrovirals or the development of any AIDS-defining illnesses,
are also interviewed about their experiences. Although the
documentary includes several leaders in the AIDS community who
present and defend current views regarding "HIV/AIDS," the
film helps define an empirical direction in thinking about how the
physiology and biochemistry of everyone differs in the context of
"HIV/AIDS," and information is presented in the interviews
regarding how different individuals have learned to cope with their
"HIV/AIDS" death sentence.
REACTION
OF THE HIV/AIDS ESTABLISHMENT TO THE WORK OF CHRISTINE MAGGIORE,
ROBIN SCOVILL, AND OTHERS WHO QUESTION ORTHODOX DOGMAS AND PUBLIC
HEALTH POLICY.
Most of the HIV/AIDS establishment
as well as some in the Gay
community, and the pharmaceutical industries that make "AIDS
drugs," have increasingly regarded the questions, efforts,
empirical, and homeopathic ideas of Christine Maggiore, Robin
Scovill, and other “HIV/AIDS” question-askers as a threat to the
rationalist, reductionist, and allopathically-focused "HIV/AIDS”
practices and public health policies, as well as perhaps, an economic
threat to pharmaceutical profits. By law, it is mandated that
"HIV/AIDS" is a reportable disease. Those who raise issue
with "HIV/AIDS dogma” or public health policies are often
regarded and treated as enemies of the medical and scientific
community.
For instance, "HIV/AIDS" critics have been called
"Holocaust deniers," “flat-earthers,” "irresponsible,"
and "criminal." From the beginning of the AIDS era, the
AIDS establishment, backed by the federal government and Epidemic
Intelligence Service, has attacked those who question any of the
accepted AIDS axioms or dogmas with increasing hostility, censorship,
and legal consequences. Recently in Maine, Oregon, Massachusetts, and
Canada, the children of parents who test "HIV-positive" and
who refuse "AIDS medications” for their children, have been
taken away by the state. Parents in some instances have faced legal
retribution. In New York at Incarnation Children's Center (ICC), an
NIH and GlaxoSmithKline-funded trial was conducted in which it is
documented that some children who refused to take their medications,
or were too young to easily manage were force fed antiretrovirals
through G-tubes surgically implanted in their stomach (4,
5). Upon threat of court martial and
military prison, since 1990-91, military inductees were forced to be
immunized with an ineffective "anthrax" vaccine, and
perhaps other experimental vaccines (such as AIDSVAX), that are known
to contain dangerous autoimmune syndrome-inducing adjuvants (because
the vaccines don't work), during Operation Desert Storm (6).
Apparently, during the early 1990's, this experimental program was
overseen by Dr. Edmund Tremont, a powerful figure in the AIDS
establishment.
The sudden and
antibiotic-associated death of child of a mother
who had previously questioned
"HIV/AIDS dogma” and public health policies regarding
"HIV/AIDS" has presented a formidable medical, social, and
political conundrum for some in the HIV/AIDS establishment. However,
Christine Maggiore is not alone. There are now thousands of
scientists including several Nobel Laureates, National Academy
members, physicians, scholars, journalists, and people living with
"HIV/AIDS" throughout the world,
who do not believe that scientific,
medical, or epidemiological evidence supports the hypothesis that
"HIV causes "AIDS," that “AIDS” is a transmissible
syndrome, or
that "HIV" is an exogenous retrovirus that has been
correctly isolated (see http://aras.ab.ca/rethinkers.htm;
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/statement/).
They
believe instead that profound immunosuppression is caused by a myriad
of factors and that it is incorrect to group these syndromes under a
single disease entity, "HIV/AIDS." The consequences of this
view suggest that different treatment strategies are needed for the
spectrum of the 46 previously known “AIDS-indicator diseases,”
rather than the toxic and dangerous pharmaceutical or vaccination
approaches currently in place.
In the aftermath of the tragic
death of Eliza Jane, and many other high profile cases that were said
to have died of "AIDS," the AIDS establishment could have
chosen one of two paths to improve Public Health policies regarding
“HIV/AIDS patients.” 1) Initiate a non-pharmaceutical company
backed scientific investigation with an open and critical look at the
accuracy of the so-called "HIV tests," the efficacy and
safety of the so-called “life saving AIDS medicines (regardless of
the fact that not one of their package inserts claims that they are
“life saving” or even that they have been tested for safety or
efficacy) and begin an investigation as to the scientific
credibility, accountability, ethics, and motives of leading AIDS
researchers who were accused of fraud and scientific misconduct at
the beginning of the AIDS era (7),
and investigate AIDS program leaders such as Edmund Tremont, who
openly admitted to changing safety reports in Nevirapine drug trials
last year because he "knew better" than other AIDS
scientists and drug-trial safety officers about "AIDS" (8).
Or, 2) the tragedy of Eliza Jane¢s death could present a golden
opportunity for some in the "HIV/AIDS" establishment to
even more vigorously attack those who ask questions regarding the
current "HIV/AIDS" paradigms, axioms, and policies, by
mounting a politically motivated, highly publicized, quasi-religious,
and Inquisition-style Salem witch hunt for Christine Maggiore and
Robin Scovill, because they have dared to question AIDS dogma, and
therefore have threatened, the "HIV=AIDS" establishment.
REVISION
OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS.
Predictably, and in retaliation
for asking questions, or for never consistently testing
"HIV-positive," and perhaps at the most vulnerable moment
in the lives of any parents, the public health officials were somehow
made aware that a reappraisal of Eliza Jane's “indeterminate”
autopsy findings by the LA coroner's office was in order, to
determine if the parents should be prosecuted, and their other child
aged 8, taken away by The State to be "HIV" tested, and
perhaps fed antiretrovirals.
The new autopsy analysis was performed by Dr. Chanikarn
Changsri of the LA coroner's office, and Dr. Maurice A. Verity, a
neuropathology consultant from UCLA who was asked to 'help her'
interpret 'the new neuropathology findings'. Also, another LA
coroner, Dr. James Ribe, was summoned in to oversee Dr. Changsri's
and Dr. Verity's report. Dr. Ribe has been under investigation by the
LA Appellate Court, and other legislative bodies, for his seriously
flawed and fraudulent autopsy findings in at least 5 well-documented
cases that led to child abuse and murder convictions of parents. For
example, in 1996, an autopsy report he wrote led to the life time
convictions of the Jacobo parents for findings he felt consistent
with child sexual abuse and murder, but which after reappraisal,
appeared consistent with a inherited vitamin deficiency, which has
led to the release of the father but not the mother, who is still in
prison for life (Case No 95-09550). Other examples of Ribe's alleged
criminal misconduct can be found at
http://www.justiceforej.com/ribeflipflops.html.)
Four months after the autopsy and case reassessment was
ordered, on September 15, 2005, Dr. Changsri, Dr. Verity, and Dr.
Ribe concluded in their autopsy report and press release to the LA
times, that Eliza Jane actually died of end-stage AIDS-related
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), and that the child suffered
from p24-positive brain encephalopathy due to the ravages of "HIV,"
despite her almost twice normal lymphocyte count of 10,800
lymphocytes/µl.
Trauma, physical abuse, or chemicals known to render the
acute symptoms consistent with the 36 hour temporal sequence of Eliza
Jane's death were eliminated through scans at VPH hospital, and at
autopsy (1,2). On May 16, 2005, blood analysis at VPH showed
that her lymphocyte count was high. The analysis showed that she had
10,800 lymphocytes/µl (normal=2000-8000
lymphocytes/µl) (2). Her
hemoglobin and hematocrit counts were low (hemoglobin=6.3 g/dl
instead of 12-16g/dl, and hematocrit=21% instead of 37-48%,
respectively). (2). Her neutrophils were measured at 12%
(normal=45-74%) (2). Her monocyte percentage was in the normal
range at 8% (normal is 4-10%) and her platelet count (214 k/µl) was
in the normal range (130 k/µl -400 k/µl) (2). The
revised autopsy revealed that she had pericardial and pleural
effusion and ascites attributed to PCP pneumonia, that her lungs,
heart, liver, and kidneys were significantly increased over the
expected average weight for her age (184%, 131%, 121%, 146% of
normal), that her liver was significantly enlarged and the
hepatocytes showed micro-and macrovesicular steatosis. that there
were non-specific microscopic lesions in the brain consisting of
microglia, multinucleated giant cells, and p24 protein staining, and
that her bone marrow showed atrophy, as did her thymus and spleen.
These findings differed significantly from "no cause of death"
detected by the coroners before they had become aware of the mother's
viewpoints on "HIV/AIDS."
ENTER
THE MEDIA.
The new finding of PCP pneumonia and
"HIV”-encephalopathy were immediately made available to the LA
Times by the coroner's office without the consent of the parents. The
findings, in addition, were presented by the LA Times and more
recently, by ABC Primetime, to insinuate heretical wrong doing on the
part of the parents and pediatricians. In the
first of many inflammatory articles that came out coincident with the
release of the revised autopsy report of Dr. Changsri, Dr.
Verity, and Dr. Ribe, entitled "A mother's
denial: a daughter's death,” The LA Times went into great
detail alluding to how Christine Maggiore barbarously gave birth to
her two children at home, refused the Holy Waters of infant vaccines,
and unconscionably breast fed her children. It described how one of
her three pediatricians defended his daughter, who was a accused of
being a Madame involved in prostitution, and worse, how Christine
never had the children tested (9), to
see if they would test as she had: positive
(the first one), indisputably positive (the second one), inconclusive
(the third one), positive (forth one), negative (fifth one), and
positive (sixth one).
PARENTS
AND PEDIATRICIANS UNDER INVESTIGATION, AND THREATS TO REMOVE CHARLIE
FROM THE FAMILY.
Predictably, and due to the coroner's revised findings
and recommendations, the parents were placed under investigation by
The Department of Children and Family Services, the LA police
department, and the media. The pediatricians are now being
investigated by the State Medical Board. To protect the unity of
their family, Christine Maggiore and Robin Scovill immediately
arranged to have their 8-year old son Charlie "HIV"-tested
multiple times by their pediatricians, and presented with
consistently negative results. The 8-year old is still living at home
with them.
INDEPENDENT
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS.
An independent investigation of the coroners' and UCLA
consultant's report was solicited from Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati. Dr.
Al-Bayati is a board certified toxicologist and UC Davis-trained
comparative pathologist, and is an expert regarding "AIDS."
He was asked to perform a differential diagnosis of Eliza Jane's
medical records, the coroner's report (1) and the hospital
records (2) to determine if indeed the findings of Changsri,
Verity, and Ribe were consistent with a toxic adverse reaction to
amoxicillin, an AIDS-related syndrome, or attributable to some other
cause.
Dr. Al-Bayati is uniquely qualified to perform a
differential diagnosis of this case because he has
published extensively on drug effects on organs and organ systems,
and is an expert in comparative pathology and toxicology. He has done
extensive work on the differential diagnosis of unusual deaths of
children, such as shaken baby syndrome. He has developed test kits
for chemical toxins such as pesticides, and has submitted 7
publications on AIDS to the widely read and highly respected British
Medical Journal (BMJ), that were accepted as Letters for publication.
He has published pioneering studies on the experimental toxicology of
the immune system network that can be found on Medline.
Notably, he has extensively
researched and written a book about AIDS (10).
It is a concise masterpiece in the differential diagnosis of AIDS.
The book provides new information regarding the epidemiology of AIDS
in risk groups, the causes and pathogenesis of AIDS in drug users,
describes how changes in the lymphoid organs and adrenal glands
appear in patients with AIDS, how cohorts of subjects were
presumptively selected for the first AZT trials without positive
"HIV" tests being obtained for the majority of cases, how
opportunistic diseases in AIDS patients are caused by the use of
drugs, how the immune network is sensitive to certain toxins, how
hemophilia patients acquire AIDS via immunosuppressive agents, how
malnutrition causes AIDS, and especially how current leaders of the
AIDS establishment, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned in the 1970's,
that over prescription of glucocorticosteroids cause profound immune
suppression before
"HIV," "a variant of a known human cancer
virus," was announced by media press release, "as being the
probable cause of AIDS" by Robert Gallo, Margaret Heckler, and
the Federal Government (11, 12).
Dr, Al-Bayati's differential diagnosis
regarding Eliza Jane's death was accepted by Medical Veritas, a
journal with an editorial board comprised of 11 physicians and 11
scientists.
Dr. Al-Bayati¢s differential diagnosis concluded that
the death was consistent with an amoxicillin adverse reaction, and
not end-stage "AIDS" (13). His report also concluded
that Dr. Changsri, Dr. Verity, and Dr. Ribe had performed an
unscientific and incorrect analysis of the autopsy data, and failed
to provide any coherent explanation for the findings consistent with
end-stage AIDS causing the girl's death. For a comparison of Dr.
Al-Bayati's analysis of the Eliza Jane Scovill case, I refer the
reader to http://JusticeForEJ.com-where Dr.
Harold E. Buttram's review of Dr. Al-Bayati's differential
diagnosis can be found. It should be mentioned that Dr. Harold E.
Buttram, MD, FAAEM is a Fellow of The American Academy of Emergency
Medicine and is a very well known pediatrician. He has served on 80
similar cases, and he completely concurs with Dr. Al-Bayati¢s
differential diagnosis.
It is clear that the events surrounding Eliza Jane's
death are as much about the medical facts of the case, as they are
about the viewpoints and activities of the parents regarding AIDS,
and the reaction of the public health service and media to these
viewpoints. Because of this complex mixture of medical, social, and
political factors in the case as I have described them so far, one
may cogently ask, "Is it even possible at this point to render a
scientifically justified understanding of the death of Eliza Jane
amidst the firestorm of politicized, quasi-religious fervor
surrounding a potential antibiotic adverse reaction, or an "AIDS"
diagnosis, in a child of a mother that doesn't consistently test
"HIV-positive?" I believe that the available facts,
interpreted in light of the temporal sequence of events leading up to
Eliza Jane's death, and in light of what is now known about adverse
reactions to amoxicillin, and "AIDS," that the true cause
of Eliza Jane's death can not be due to "HIV/AIDS," or any
"AIDS-defining illness."
ADVERSE
REACTION TO AMOXICILLIN.
Nobody can claim to be an expert on adverse reactions to
drugs: the science that studies them is at its infancy. However, it
is widely appreciated that adverse reactions for all kinds of
pharmaceutical interventions are under-reported, or aren¢t reported
at all. No physician or hospital wants to be responsible for the
tragic event that a prescription, meant to alleviate suffering,
caused an adverse reaction or death of a patient. Yet the history of
drug and vaccine trials show that responses to these and other
medical interventions are always associated with unpredictable
adverse responses, as the physiology of every human is different.
When adverse reactions do occur, they may be difficult or impossible
to pigeonhole as a stereotypical series of complications.
Nevertheless, and despite under reporting, beta-lactam
adverse reactions are frequently reported. Most doctors indeed
ask, "are you or is your child allergic to penicillins or other
antibiotics," before they are prescribed.
The World Health Organization puts the figure of adverse
reactions to this class of drugs at around 0.7%-10%, depending on the
nation studied (14).
In a 2000 case report, da
Fonseca reported that (15):
"Penicillin is the drug
that most often leads to allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. The
incidence of adverse events triggered by penicillins is believed to
be between 1% and 10%. Up to one-tenth of these episodes are
life-threatening, with the most serious reactions occurring in
patients with no history of
allergy."
Investigators who study allergic
reactions, such as Gomes et al., reported that: (16):
"The prevalence of
self-reported drug allergy was 7.8% (181/2309):
4.5% to penicillins or other
betalactams, 1.9% to aspirin
or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and 1.5% to
other drugs. In the group 'allergic to beta-lactams', the most
frequently implicated drug was penicillin G or V (76.2%) followed by
the association of amoxicillin and clavulanic acids (14.3%)."
"Women were significantly
more likely to claim a drug allergy than men (10.2% vs. 5.3%). The
most common manifestations were cutaneous (63.5%), followed
by cardiovascular symptoms (35.9%).
Most of the reactions were immediate, occurring
on the first day of treatment (78.5%).
Out of 2409 spontaneous adverse
event reporting from 1991-1996 in Bulgaria:
" 29%
of the adverse drug reaction reports concerned the patients in
the age groups of 0-5 year old, and
amoxicillin is a drug with a majority
of reports for the period"
(17).
A group in Spain reported similar
findings where amoxicillin caused the most adverse reactions (18).
So-called delayed reactions with amoxicillin are also
frequent, and are a subject of intense investigation. For example,
there is a developed literature on the subject with titles such as:
"Diagnosing nonimmediate
reactions to penicillins by in vivo
tests" (19),
"A diagnostic protocol for evaluating nonimmediate
reactions to aminopenicillins"
(20),
"Diagnosis of nonimmediate
reactions to betalactam antibiotics"
(21),
"Role of delayed cellular
hypersensitivity and adhesion
molecules in amoxicillin-induced morbilliform rashes" (22),
"Nonimmediate reactions
to betalactams: prevalence and role of the different penicillins"
(23),
"In vitro T-cell responses to beta-lactam drugs in immediate and
nonimmediate allergic reactions"
(24), "Skin test evaluation in
nonimmediate allergic reactions
to penicillins" (25),
"Two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis caused by delayed
hypersensitivity to beta-lactam
antibiotics" (26),
"Immediate and delayed
hypersensitivity from penicillin
(27),
"Incidence of beta-lactam-induced delayed
hypersensitivity and
neutropenia during treatment of
infective endocarditis" (28).
Nevertheless, in their allopathic
training, most medical students are only taught that "a true
amoxicillin allergic reaction" is rapid and stereotypic, would
present as tachycardia and produce its symptoms within seconds or
minutes instead of hours or days, and would be rapidly reversible by
administration of epinephrine. This misinformation ignores the
developed literature on delayed hypersensitivity reactions indicated
above. The weight of Eliza Jane's heart as reported by the ME at
autopsy was 131% of normal. This evidence of ventricular hypertrophy
(or edema) is best attributed to loss of pressure due to loss of
fluid over a period of hours from the capillaries in heart, and
subsequent widely observed compensation by the heart muscle to pump
more fluid. It also ignores the likelihood that
electromechanical dissociation (EMD), may have been responsible for
the slowed rhythms of her heart and the pulseless state that were
noted by the ER staff (rather than tachycardia), in association with
hypotensive multiple organ failure accompanying massive edema (loss
of fluid from the vasculature into the organs and tissues). If there
is significant loss of blood volume from the vasculature, because 40%
of it has leaked out into the tissues due to the toxic effects of
amoxicillin, and if the vasculature continues to be permeable, as
indicated by the measurements of Eliza Jane's abnormal organ weights,
then as long as the antibiotic was present, and inducing a series of
reactions leading to vascular permeability, it wouldn't matter if
the heart was restarted or even working normally, or how much IV
solution she was infused with. This hypothesis
is supported by the fact that although the ER treatments of
epinephrine transiently stimulated the heart to beat on several
occasions, before she was given more antibiotics of an undisclosed
type at the hospital, and presumably more IV's, the multiple boluses
of epinephrine couldn't stabilize her heart for very long, or restore
normal blood pressure or normal pulse. The IV fluids
repeatedly administered could have killed her by continuing to swell
her heart as they leaked out, causing EMD, and drowning her lungs
(and kidneys) with extravasated proteins and fluids leaked from the
vasculature. However, the fact that her abdomen and liver were
protruding by the time she arrived at the ER may have meant that she
had already leaked too much fluid from her own vasculature to ever
recover normal vascular blood volume, even before the multiple
IV's were administered, principally from the delayed adverse reaction
to the amoxicillin itself (2):
"On May 14th, in a
follow-up visit, one of the physicians found that her lungs were
clear, but noted redness in addition to fluid in her right eardrum.
He prescribed 400mg of amoxicillin twice a day to the
beta-lactam-naïve child" (1).
"After the third dose of
amoxicillin, she vomited several times, and she became agitated. Her
mother noticed that her face became pale, her arms changed color and
were cold to the touch. She became lethargic and ran a low fever.
Then she fell unconscious and stopped breathing, and no pulse could
be felt by the emergency team or by the admitting physicians"
(2).
"The Los Angeles City Fire Department RA 239 was
dispatched on May 16th at 0003 and arrived
at Eliza Jane's home at 0006 (1,2). Upon the
paramedic's arrival, Eliza Jane was found pulseless and apneic on the
floor. She was cyanotic with cold extremities and asystolic on the
cardiac monitor."
"Eliza Jane was presented at the emergency room
of Valley Presbyterian Hospital at 0026 on May 16th.
On arrival, she was pulseless, had no spontaneous respiration, and
appeared very pale. Her pupils were mid position and fixed."
"The treating physician examined Eliza Jane and
found that her abdomen and her liver were distended. Her extremities
were cold and poorly perfused with non-palpable pulses. Her oral
mucous membranes were pink and there was a lesion on her lower lip."
"At 0105 her heart rate began to slow down into
the 40-60 b/min range and she did not have a papable pusle. CPR was
restarted. She was bagged with 100% O2 and given high dose
epinephrine 1.3mg, atropine 0.26 mg, and sodium bicarbonate 13 mEq.
Her heart rate began to increase, it came up to 113 b/minute, and
she had a palpable pulse."
"At 0137, no blood pressure could be
obtained and Eliza Jane was started on dopamine drip at 5
microgram/kg per hour. Her blood pressure reached to 41/28
and was taken to CT scan. While in CT scan, she had another episode
of asystole and she was given atropine, and sodium bicarbonate. She
developed a pulse again and was transferred to the Pediatric ICU."
"At the PICU, her heart rate reached
approximately 120b/min but she did not have a pulse. She
was given fluid boluses, as well as being placed on
dopamine 10 microgram/kg/hour and dobutamine 10 microgram/kg per
hour. She did not have a pulse and her blood pressure was
not obtainable in spite of these treatments. She was
also started on antibiotics."
The type of antibiotic given in the PICU is not
disclosed, but is of concern, given that Eliza Jane presented with
classic signs, and a package-insert-perfect description of an adverse
reaction to amoxicillin, rather than end-stage AIDS, as stated by the
Medical Examiner's office.
Amoxicillin package inserts (29) describe most if
not all the reactions manifested by Eliza Jane in their warnings (I
have underlined the adverse events manifested by Eliza Jane as
described by her parents, the hospital, and the coroner's report).
"1. Beta lactam
antibiotics
Anaphylactic reactions
manifested by urticaria, flushing, pruritus, laryngeal edema, and
cardiovascular collapse
may occur within minutes or,
less frequently, hours after
administration of beta lactam antibiotics (ie, drugs that have a
common beta lactam ring structure)."
SIDE
EFFECTS AND SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS
Gastro-intestinal side effects
including diahrroea, nausea
and vomiting may
occur quite frequently.
Pseudomembranous colitis has also been reported.Super-infection is
relatively common. Doses should be reduced in severe renal
failure.
Nausea and vomiting occurred after
Eliza Jane's second dose of amoxicillin. Eliza Jane's kidneys were
measured at 146% of normal, without significant damage exhibited
microscopically, consistent with massive edema and recent injury.
"The most feared
adverse events attributed
to beta-lactam antibiotics are IgE type I immediate or accelerated
reactions. These develop
within minutes to hours
of drug administration and cause hypotension,
laryngeal edema or bronchospasm.
Such reactions occur when
patients with preformed beta-lactam-specific IgE antibodies, which
are bound to tissue mast cells and circulating basophils, are exposed
to the drug or tissue protein complex, resulting in the release of
inflammatory mediators."
"Unpredictable reactions
occur independent of the dose and route of administration and reflect
such factors as drug
intolerance, allergy, and
other idiosyncratic responses.
These reactions seem to preferentially affect certain body systems,
most commonly
blood,
skin, and liver."
Eliza Jane's bood work was
abnormal to the extent that she was profoundly anemic and exhibited a
low hematocrit (Her hemoglobin and hematocrit counts were low
(6.3 g/dl instead of 12-16g/dl, and 21% instead of 37-48%,
respectively). (2). Her neutrophils were measured at 12%
(normal=45-74%) (2). Her monocyte percentage was in the normal
range at 8% (normal is 4-10%) and her platelet count (214 k/µl) was
in the normal range (130 k/µl -400 k/µl) (2).
And as indicated on the
amoxicillin package insert:
"Additional unique
life-threatening reactions caused by beta-lactam antibiotics are
referred to as "late" reactions. They include such events
as hemolytic anemia,
Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and exfoliative dermatitis."
Her liver findings were abnormal
as well: Eliza Jane autopsy showed liver changes consistent with an
immune reaction to amoxicillin, which in some cases of acute toxicity
has been noted to resemble pregnancy-fat-like-accumulation and
steatosis (30-33).
It is also now emphasized during
the early training of many clinicians, as well as in the literature
(16),
that the effects of amoxicillin on the liver are usually only found
when used with another drug, clavulanate, but this misinformation is
not supported by the primary literature in Medline: there are many
reports that indicate the rate of acute reactions occur in multiple
cohorts of patients who were studied for amoxicillin versus
amoxicillin-clavulanate reactions, and both appear quite frequently,
judging by the number of reports. Perhaps the most comprehensive
report that surveys the growing literature on the subject of
amoxicillin versus amoxicillin/ clavulanate is presented by Berg et
al, and in connection to both fatal and non-fatal adverse reactions
to amoxicillin/amoxicillin clavulanate, which they claim typically
occur after antibiotic therapy was discontinued, and serves to
reinforce the idea that none of these drugs can be considered as
safe, even after they are withdrawn (34).
Eliza Jane was never
administered any skin allergy tests for amoxicillin, which may have
been a wise thing to do, for a bata-lactam-naïve child of an
immunologically hyper-reactive mother.
Even so, there have even been references to amoxicillin-induced death
when cutaneous sensitivity tests to the beta-lactam drugs are given
at allergy testing doses (which are extremely small doses) to
determine if someone is allergic to these drugs, before giving them a
full dose (35).
One group of allergists have even
postulated the technical term "flare-up" to describe these
kind of delayed reactions as a Type IV mechanism, and described the
difficulty in typifying these kinds of reactions. As stated by Reig
Rincon de Arellano I et al., (36).
" We suggest that this
phenomenon of Flare up occurs by a Type IV mechanism mediated by
T-cells without participation of IgE antibodies. The betalactam
hypersensitivity mechanism which has usually been described is an IgE
mediated reaction, but there are
other not very well known mechanisms that are responsible for the
delayed reactions."
Also, adverse drug reactions often present with a myriad
of unusual symptoms, and they may be difficult to recognize as
adverse reactions, rather than as some complication of the illness
for which they were prescribed. Among some clinical trial
investigators within the "AIDS" Establishment for example,
awareness is increasing that the "HIV"-targeted
antiretrovirals and protease inhibitors hasten death and morbidity in
patients through the induction of profound immune suppression,
profound anemia, mitochondrial damage, muscle wasting, dementia,
liver damage, renal damage, heart damage, birth defects,
carcinogenesis, and many other toxin-induced syndromes listed on the
package inserts of AZT, 3TC, other NRTI's [Nucleoside Reverse
Transcriptase inhibitors, Non-nucleoside Resverse
Transcriptase Inhibitors, non-specific “DNA chain terminators”
such as 3Tc, ddI, and others, and protease inhibitors (37-65)].
Many “AIDS specialists,” will not give these highly immunotoxic
HAART drugs to patients whose T-cells are above 200 cells/ml.
Instead, they prescribe the immunosuppressive cocktails only
to patients whose immune systems are already showing evidence of
failing, consistent with the new recommendations of the AIDS
establishment (see: Yeni PG et al.
Antiretroviral treatment for adult HIV infection in 2002: updated
recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. JAMA.
2002 Jul 10; 288(2): 222-35, which stated:
"The available data from
cohort studies, with one exception, have not been able to define a
CD4 stratum above 200 cells/microliter at which patients benefit from
initiation of therapy"..
In the case of Eliza Jane, and in light of this growing
“awareness” and compassion on the part of some members of the
AIDS establishment who appear to be retreating more and more from
their old battle-cry “Hit ¡em hard and early,” it is surprising
that at least some members of the AIDS establishment that are aware
of the Eliza Jane Scovill case have failed to attribute the death of
Eliza Jane to an amoxicillin adverse reaction, rather than to
end-stage "AIDS."
The symptoms in the 36 hours preceding the death of
Eliza Jane's are consistent with a delayed sensitivity reaction
followed by edema in multiple critical organs. The coroner should
have focused on amoxicillin first and foremost, because it was the
last (known) agent given before she arrested (as specified before,
another antibiotic was given but was not disclosed in the hospital
report). Furthermore, the acute symptoms presented were consistent
with a delayed adverse reaction to amoxicillin, according to the
drug's package inserts, the clinical marketing experience, the data
entered by the ER staff when they tried to revive her (2), and
her parent's descriptions of her symptoms immediately preceding her
collapse (1).
NO
EVIDENCE OF IMMUNE SUPPRESSION IN ELIZA JANE.
Is there only one mechanism that can scientifically
account for the complexity of AIDS? The term "AIDS," stands
for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. To distinguish
AIDS from other known forms of immune suppression, the term AIDS is
used to describe persons who are said to exhibit immune suppression
specifically because of the negative direct and indirect biochemical
activity of "HIV" on lymphoid cells in the body, causing
profound immune suppression. The suppression could be reflected in
decreases in total or specific immune cell subsets, or, perhaps in a
decline in function of existing immune cells. Therefore, to establish
an "AIDS" diagnosis, "AIDS" immune suppression is
determined by detecting a loss of CD4+ lymphocytes, and more
specifically in AIDS cases, the finding of an inverted ratio of
CD4+CD8+ T-cell lymphocytes. Eliza Jane's absolute CD4+ cell count
wasn't measured by the coroner, nor was her CD4+/CD8+ ratio. However,
her absolute lymphocyte count was measured at the hospital (2),
which was 10,800 lymphocytes/µl). More
than anything else, this number of cells strongly argues against her
being an ARC or end-stage AIDS victim, and excludes her as someone
suffering from immune suppression of any kind. Because lymphocyte
counts in AIDS patients are lower than 1000 cells/microliter, by
definition, there is no possible way Eliza Jane could be considered
to be an AIDS victim or victim of immune suppression.
To address the issue of why absolute lymphocytes versus
CD4/CD8 ratios weren't measured before the coroners were made aware
of Christine Maggiore's (inconsistent) "HIV-positive status,"
and before the coroners changed their initial “indeterminate”
cause of death, and deemed Eliza Jane an "AIDS statistic,"
it is clear that there was no reason for anyone to assume that in
Eliza Jane's case, they were dealing with an immune suppressed
individual. Her acute symptoms during her 36-hour death appeared to
be due to a hyper-immune reaction to a prescribed drug.
However, despite the coroner's failure to provide a CD4+/CD8+ ratio
in support of the "AIDS diagnosis," it should be
emphasized that the accuracy of total lymphocyte counts in predicting
death due to "AIDS-associated indicator diseases" is
considered equal or even superior to measuring the CD4/CD8 ratio.
Therefore, and despite the fact that CD4/CD8 ratios were NOT obtained
(by those attributing her death to AIDS after the revised autopsy
report was filed some 4 months after the death), absolute lymphocyte
numbers were obtained at the hospital, and according to "AIDS
experts," they are just as predictive of AIDS-related death in
children, if not more so. In a recent study of 3917 children, it was
reported that (66):
“For children older than 2 years,
the 12-month risk of death and AIDS increased sharply at values less
than 1500-2000
cells per microliter, with little trend at
higher values.” (Eliza
Jane's count was 10,800 cells/microliter).
“Mortality risk was
substantially higher at
thresholds of total lymphocyte count recommended by WHO than at
corresponding thresholds of CD4-cell percentage.
When the markers were compared at the threshold values at which
mortality risks were about equal, total lymphocyte count was as
effective as CD4-cell
percentage for identifying children before death…”
In the context of lymphocyte numbers, and despite
disagreement in "AIDS science" about what mechanism
explains why low lymphocyte numbers are seen in end-stage "AIDS
patients," most AIDS researchers still agree that low, rather
than high lymphocyte numbers have something to do with full-blown
"AIDS." For example, even David Ho
and David Douek- principal AIDS-Establishment advocates who continue
to advocate and use Kary Mullis's PCR test to detect “viral load”
(and which Mullis the Nobelist who created the test continues to
unconditionally deny as being able to do so), chaired a meeting at
the12th International Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic
infections, where a consensus emerged that "HIV" attacks
the gut {stupid}. A few statements from a Science article describing
the meeting may be helpful:
“It¢s the gut, stupid. That
was one of the clearest take-home messages from the 12th
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, where 3900
researchers from 72 countries converged to discuss some of the most
fundamental questions riddling the field” (67).
"Despite 20 years of
research on "HIV," debates
still rage about the path from infection to immunological mayhem.
There is abundant evidence that HIV preferentially infects and
decimates CD4+ white blood cells, and researchers have long argued
that direct killing alone accounts for the profound CD4 loss that is
the hallmark of AIDS. That prompted David Ho, chair of this year's
meeting, to once wear a button saying, "It¢s the virus,
stupid." Another camp contends that HIV infects a relatively
small number of CD4 cells, and indirectly causes the death of
uninfected innocent bystanders by activating them, a process leading
to their death" (67).
“Just as the inflammation
caused by hepatitis destroys the liver, chronic inflammation of the
lymph nodes –which Douek dubbed “immunitis-destroys their
architecture, leading to massive buildup of collagen, causing
fibrosis” (67).
Yet other "AIDS experts,"
and indeed the original proponents of "LAV" ("HIV)"
suggested the idea that HIV" virus-like particles, surrogate
markers, and lymphocyte and lymph node pathogenesis associated with
these particles might merely constitute the break-down material from
excessive cell activation. It was suggested by the work of different
groups of investigators (Bess, Gluschankof, and
others), that the virus-like particles represent a laboratory Petri
dish artifact of phytohemmaglutinnin (PHA-a plant lectin that
oxidizes lymphocytes) and interleukin 2 (IL2)-stimulated peripheral
blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) to secrete vesicles through a
phenomenon known as blebbing.
In a series of papers published at the beginning of the
AIDS era (68 ,69,70), Montagnier and his colleagues reported
that electron microscopy of the "umbilical cord lymphocytes that
were "infected" with patient 1's lymphocytes exhibited
immature particles with dense crescent (C-type) budding at the plasma
membane, and they characterized them as "a typical
type-C RNA TUMOR virus." In 1984, this same group
reported "HIV" to be a type D retrovirus, and later "HIV"
was reported to be a lentivirus. Montagnier's Patient 1 from which
these cells were derived, according to his 1983 paper, also had
acquired herpes, 2 cases of gonnorhea, 1 case of syphilis,
cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus before his "LAV"
diagnosis. (See Montagnier L. Historical accuracy of HIV isolation.
Nat Med 9, 1235, 2003, for a recent debate about whether or not a
retrovirus was "isolated" in 1983 that could cause
cytopathic effects on T-cells).
The in vitro evidence from this
group that first discovered "LAV" ("HIV")
suggested that "the mitogen-induced creation of "HIV"
was consistent with the hypothesis that:
"Mitogenic
stimulation and activation, in control cultures in the absence of
HIV, can induce the same cytopathic effects as sera or cells derived
from "AIDS" patients."
In other words, Montagnier and his
colleagues showed that HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient for
the induction of the cytopathic effects observed in HIV infected
cultures.
Other groups also provided evidence that the artificial
stimulation of cultures with mitogens, and not viral replication, led
to cell death (71). The DAIDS 1997
official "HIV" culturing manual, under quality control,
Section VI, implores:
Although Dr. Gallo and others have claimed that in a
stadium full of "HIV-negative" people, not one molecule of
"HIV" will be present, the DAIDS (Division of AIDS)
culturing manual says that if "HIV-infected" cells from
human blood express more than 30 units of “HIV-specific” p24
protein on 2 or 3 separate tests (30 pg/ml), one is considered
“HIV-positive,” and if one sleeps with somebody without telling
them they have these 30 or more units, one can be tried for attempted
murder, one can¢t obtain health insurance, one might be fired from
his or her job, one might commit suicide, if pregnant one may be
frightened into aborting her baby. If your cells express less than 30
units of this protein 2 or 3 separate times (pg/ml), then one is
considered non-"HIV-infected" and is home free-one can
donate blood, sleep with anyone he or she wants, without telling them
his or her “less than 30 status,” etc. How could this be possible
if there isn't one molecule of "HIV" in a stadium full of
"HIV-negative" people? Its an arbitrary measurement of a
molecular signature that may have nothing to do with a virus or
immune suppression that is arbitrarily being measured at more than 30
units for an "infected" person, and less than 30 units for
a non-infected person (72).
The certainty of these kinds of data are what have prompted the
Public Health Service, The Media, the AIDS Establishment, and indeed,
all those who defend and support the "HIV=AIDS" hypothesis
to attack an inconsistently positive woman, and her family during the
tragic period of loss of a daughter?
Articles published in The New
England Journal of Medicine claim, in addition, that "HIV"
infects and destroys heart muscle even in the absence of HAART (73,
74), and causes wasting in skeletal
muscle, and disrupts other non-cycling cells, or cells that even lack
nuclei (such as platelets in thrombocytopenia, or red blood cells in
anemia)? Yet if "HIV" specifically destroys only cycling
cells such as lymphocytes, macrophages, or other cycling cells, it
could not possibly affect these other, non-cycling cells. What has
been confused for "HIV's" terrible long-term effects have
been confused, in many cases, with the toxic effects of medication
regimens.
It was also pointed out by Luc
Montagnier, and in a series of papers by other AIDS experts based in
Australia known as The Perth Group, (68,
69, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78) that:
"....replication
and cytopathic effect of LAV ("HIV") can only be observed
in activated T4 cells. Indeed, LAV infection of resting T4 cells does
not lead to viral replication or to expression of viral antigen on
the cell surface, while stimulation by lectins or antigens of the
same cells results in the production of viral particles, antigenic
expression and the cytopathic effect."
Importantly, and after much
research into the circumstances required for the in vitro induction
of "HIV" viral-like particles, p24, and other
"HIV"-associated surrogate markers being induced by IL2 and
PHA, or in vivo by perhaps other inducers such as chronic drug use,
transfusions, and hemophilia medications and treatments,
Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., concluded that the most likely
explanation for the appearance of "HIV" virus-like
particles and surrogate markers in both infected and non-infected
AIDS cultures and AIDS patients was explained by oxidation due to
artificial (pathological) stimulation of lymphocytes with various
oxidizing agents, and that these agents could induce the production
of "retroviral-like particles" and their surrogate markers
from normal uninfected cells (75-78):
"Since both AIDS cultures
and AIDS patients are exposed to mitogens (activating agents), many
of which are oxidizing agents, the production of viral-like
particles, reverse transcriptase, antigen/antibody reactions (WB),
and "HIV-PCR- hybridization"may be due simply to oxidative
stress which stimulates expression of latent "retroviral"
sequences….."(78).
According to this hypothesis,
"retroviral-like particles" or their surrogate markers
(p24, reverse transcriptase, nucleic acids thought to be specific for
"HIV") are not transmitted to the host from outside through
infection (they aren't in fact 'exogenous'), but instead, are evoked
and derived 'endogenously,' from oxidized cells that produce them
when they are stressed.
Gallo and his colleagues also
reported that (79):
"The expression of
HTLV-III was always preceded by the initiation of interleukin-2
secretion, both of which occurred only
when T-cells were immunologically [PHA] activated."
In other words, the immunological
stimulation with PHA is required for IL-2 secretion, and during this
artificial stimulation of lymphocytes, "viral-like particles"
or "retroviral sequence" expression in the absence of any
type of infection, is induced, and is accompanied by cell death in
some experiments. Thus, relatively early during the AIDS era, it was
known that HIV is not necessary or sufficient for the appearance of
the cytopathic effects seen in T-cell cultures, yet for some unknown
reason, up till 1991 very little (or no) data was presented regarding
the effects of the activating agents themselves on T-cell survival or
dynamics in culture.
Other investigators involved in
the AIDS Vaccine Program, SAIC, National Cancer Institute-Frederick
Cancer Research and Development Center, Maryland, also published
reports stating that PHA (phytohemmaglutinin) and IL2 (interleukin-2)
stimulated healthy cells produce "viral like particles" and
HIV 'specific' proteins only when
stimulated with PHA and IL-2. They also claimed that microvesicles
were a source of contaminating cellular proteins found in purified
HIV-1 preparations, as the title of their paper, " Microvesicles
are a source of contaminating cellular proteins found in purified
HIV-1 preparations," suggests (80).
This would also be consistent with
what is hypothesized more generally about retroviral sequence
expression.
For example, other AIDS researchers from The Department
of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, even as
early as 1992, claimed that “HIV” gene sequences can be evoked
from non-infected humans, chimps, and monkeys (81):
"Endogenous
retrovirus-related sequences exist within the normal genomic DNA of
all eukaryotes, and these endogenous sequences have been shown to be
important to the nature and biology of related exogenous retroviruses
and may also play a role in cellular functions. To date, no
endogenous sequences related to human immunodeficiency virus type 1
(HIV-1) have been reported. Herein
we describe the first report of the presence of nucleotide sequences
related to HIV-1 in human, chimpanzee, and rhesus monkey DNAs from
normal uninfected individuals."
This concept is consistent with
what other investigators have discovered about retroids-genetic
elements that are abundant in the human genome that code for
endogenous sequences of great similarity to "HIV's" (82).
Yet another indication of the
probable endogenous nature of "LAV," "HIV," "Type
C tumor virus," or "lentivirus," or whatever you want
to call “HIV's” molecular signature, the failure of the
“HIV/AIDS” vaccine (AIDSVAX) pogrom, followed by the failure of
the STEP trial, and because of at least 60 other documented failed
"HIV' vaccine pogroms, demonstrates perhaps best of all that
materials isolated from "AIDS" patients to be used as
antigens in healthy people as a vaccine are not antigenic in that
“HIV-positivity” was not shown to be consistently invoked in the
vaccinated experimental arms of any trial to date, because these
components were not recognized by the immune system as foreign, or
exogenous. If "HIV" components were antigenic, then
everyone vaccinated (or even some of those vaccinated) should at
least temporarily test "HIV" positive. It was even
announced by Dr. Robert Gallo himself last year that (83):
"A
sound Rationale (is) needed for Phase III HIV vaccine trials"
In
this Science
article,
the AIDSVAX trials were criticized by Gallo and his co-authors
because they were from the beginning, a colossal waste of time,
money, but most of all, as Gallo warns in the last sentence of the
letter to Science, the trials are potentially damaging for the
credibility (and future funding) of the "HIV=AIDS"
paradigm.
"The
decision about whether or not to proceed with mounting a phase III
HIV-1 vaccine trial needs to take into account the likelihood of
success and the consequences of failure, the value of what can
realistically be learned, the
human and financial costs involved.
As a whole, the scientific community must do a better job of bringing
truly promising vaccine candidates to this stage of development and
beyond."
(83).
It
would seem at this point that Robert Gallo and the AIDS
establishment, "must
do a better job" of establishing a credible disease hypotheses
in connection with either cancer or immune suppression,
and they should start doing "this better job" by providing
evidence that they have isolated an exogenous virus according to
routine standards of microbial isolation worked out by Pasteur and
his two lab assistants at low budget for rabies, anthrax and chicken
cholera more than 130 years ago, and then perhaps show that "HIV"
has a consistent effect on cells, or show that it is even associated
with a disease syndrome or has an effect on T-cells according to the
standards of routine tissue culture or animal models in which
"AIDS-indicator diseases" can be shown to occur.
In the 1991 paper published in
Virology by Montagnier's group, additionally showed that (70):
" in acutely HIV infected CEM
cultures in the presence of mycoplasma removal agent, cell death
(apoptosis) is maximum at 6-7 days post infection, whereas maximal
virus production occurred at Days 10-17."
This is important not only because
effect appears to be preceding cause (you'd expect maximal virus
production to correspond to the time when the maximum of cell death
is measured at day 6-7, but here cell death at 6-7 days precedes
maximal virus production which is at 10-17 days, after the majority
of cells are "killed"). Indeed, I was always taught that
viruses require cells for their replication, because viruses are
non-living things, but these results suggest that a lot of
replication of virus is occurring on days 10-17 after the majority of
cells are supposedly killed by "the virus" on days 6-7. The
statement is also important because it suggests that mycoplasma
removal agent affected the outcome of these experiments, since
mycoplasmas are responsible somehow for the effects that are observed
in these experiments, and not "HIV." Among experts of cell
culturing, mycoplasma infections act like a putative "AIDS-causing
retrovirus" might have been expected to act, because cells
become "weakened" over time, but are not killed by
mycoplasma infections.
Yet in some cultures, Montagnier's
group also stated that:
"In chronically infected
CEM cells and the monocytic line, U937, no
apoptosis was detected although "these cells produced
continuously infectious virus."
If this is true, then why should
continuously productive lymphocytes producing infectious "HIV"
induce any cellular pathology in humans?
This non-pathogenic effect noted
in persistently infected T-cell cultures was also noted in 1985 by
Hoxie et al. in a paper published in 1985 in Science
entitled:
"Persistent noncytopathic
infection of normal human T ymphocytes with AIDS-associated
retrovirus (84).”
A lack of pathological effect on T
cells in vitro noted by Montagnier et al. and Hoxie et al. would not
be inconsistent with one of Gallo's initial claims regarding one of
the characteristics of the first "AIDS" defining disease,
Kaposi's Sarcoma, where he proclaimed that:
"The association of
Kaposi's sarcoma with AIDS deserves special mention. This otherwise
extremely rare malignancy occurs predominantly in a restricted group,
that is, the homosexuals, and
can occur in the absence of any T-cell defect in the patients"
(85).
Although opportunistic infections
are still currently considered to be a hallmark of "AIDS"
by the AIDS establishment, it hasn't been that long since the other
hallmark AIDS-indicator disease, Kaposi's Sarcoma, was considered to
be caused by "HIV," but which is no longer considered to be
caused by "HIV (86)
(currently, there are 46 previously known diseases that have become
AIDS-indicator diseases: 6 AIDS-indicator cancers (Kaposi's sarcoma
is no longer considered an AIDS-defining illness so actually it is 5
cancers currently), 10 generalized AIDS-indicator syndromes (such as
a long-lasting fever or headache), 16 opportunistic AIDS-indicator
microbial and parasitic infections, 5 AIDS-indicator viral infections
such as Herpes, the 7 AIDS-indicator birth or perinatal syndromes
such as heart defects, and 4 new AIDS-defining illnesses).
Perhaps a few years from now, as
AIDS disease definitions continue to change, it is possible that all
of the 16 opportunistic infections that have been considered
"AIDS-indicator diseases, as well as the 5 cancers, 10
generalized AIDS-indicator syndromes (such as a long-lasting fever or
headache), 5 AIDS-indictor viral infections such as Herpes or HPV,
the 7 AIDS-indicator birth or perinatal syndromes such as heart
defects among babies of drug-addicted women, and the 4 recently added
AIDS-defining illnesses including "exacerbation of Alzheimer's
dementia," will be no longer considered "AIDS-indicator
diseases," in the same manner that Kaposi's sarcoma, which was
one of the original two, is no longer considered as one? Conversely,
if the AIDS establishment continues to add more and more previously
known syndromes to the definition of AIDS, are we expected to now
accept the idea that an amoxicillin adverse reaction now be added to
these 46 AIDS-indicator diseases, and constitute the 47th
AIDS-defining syndrome? In this scenario, it would mean that if a
patient possesses a p24-positive signal in any tissue while
experiencing an amoxicillin adverse reaction, then, that person is an
AIDS patient (even in persons such as Eliza Jane with 10,800
lymphocytes/µl), whereas an amoxicillin adverse reaction minus a
p24-positive signal would simply be classified as your "ordinary"
amoxicillin adverse reaction.
This cursory survey of various "AIDS"
hypotheses regarding cytopathogenicity presented here shows that one
mechanism cannot possibly explain the complexity of "AIDS."
Different investigators, and indeed even the
same investigators have published different outcomes of experiments
that point to different hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of
"HIV," or indeed, have published that no pathogenic
behavior is seen with "persistently infected cultures" at
all. According to these hypotheses, "HIV/AIDS" is induced
by cellular or environmental stressors, and not due to an exogenous
infectious, transmissible microbe. Different investigators have
suggested that "the AIDS-indicator diseases" are caused by
either direct or indirect lymphoid depletion in the Peyer's patches
of the gut, (although no evidence for this hypothesis was given in
the Science article in the same patient over time-especially in AIDS
drug-naïve patients. Instead, in this article, anyone who would
doubt this claim are referred to as “stupid,” by Ho and other
"HIV=AIDS" advocates) (67).
Yet the first work on lymphadenopathy and “LAV” by Montagnier
claimed that lymphadenapathy (or GRID as it was then considered-Gay
Related Immune Disorder) was associated
with a typical
type-C RNA TUMOR virus." Other
work has claimed that "HIV" is not an exogenous virus at
all, but a mitogen-or toxin-evoked expression of endogenously
generated viral-like particles and "HIV-sequences" probably
due to oxidative stress. Still other work has claimed that there is
NO apoptosis observed in cultures that produce
"continuously-infectious retrovirus" which implies that
"HIV" has no effect on T-cells in vitro or in Humans.
Montagnier¢s group also published that a co-factor like mycoplasma
infection may play the important role in T-cell pathogenesis because
the addition of mycoplasma removal agent exhibits dynamics and timing
of cell death in such a way that the (apoptotic) effect of "HIV"
(cell death) precedes the proposed cause (high viral expression), and
Robert Gallo himself asserted that homosexual patients can develop
the first hallmark AIDS-indicator disease, Kaposi's Sarcoma, without
any detectable T-cell defect whatsoever according to Gallo, which is
effect without any cause in this case (although Kaposi's is no longer
considered to be caused by "HIV" but caused by HHV8) (86).
NO
EVIDENCE FOR PNEUMOCYSTIS CARINII PNEUMONIA (PCP) IN ELIZA JANE.
If anything, Eliza Jane had a perfect or even
hyperactive immune system because of her lymphocyte count of 10,800
lymphocytes/µl (see above). Therefore, the conclusions of the
ME are unjustifiable regarding the conclusion that she had end-staged
PC pneumonia.
PCP is a disease that presents with a daunting
complexity of findings in "ARC" or end-staged "AIDS"
patients. PCP is thought to be ubiquitous in humans, and presents in
humans with a daunting array of different phenotypes that are still
being investigated, as the study of PCP is at its infancy.
However, there is no controversy about PCP being
associated with immune suppression before or during the history of
the AIDS era. All information to date indicates that PCP occurs only
in individuals that are immunocompromised from a variety of natural
or iatragenic causes. Some of these causes include long-term
corticosteroid treatments, organ transplantation and
immunosuppressive anti-rejection treatments, cancer chemotherapy,
transfusions, or it is seen along with other concurrent long-term
infections such as TB.
Eliza Jane's lymphocyte count, above all, demonstrates
that she was not immune suppressed: she had never received
corticosteroids, transplants, or chemotherapy, she did not have
cancer, and her lung findings were inconsistent with a developed
pneumonia of any kind. The microscopic examination of Eliza Jane's
lungs revealed no evidence of inflammation, which in an
immunocompromised host such as an advanced "AIDS" patient
may not be present, but in a patient with 10,800
lymphocytes/µl, an inflammatory response and fibrosis after a
long-term or even a short-term infection would be likely. Yet, the ME
did not observe any inflammatory response or fibrosis in the alveoli
or in the interstitial tissue to justify a diagnosis of Pneumocystis
carinii pneumonia or any other form of pneumonia (1).
Another mistake that underscores the unscientific
re-analysis by the ME, regards the 'finding' of Pneumocystis
organisms in the lung associated with "foamy casts," and
arriving at a conclusion, in the absence of indicators of
inflammation or fibrosis in an immunocompetent patient,
that these organisms were pathogenic in EJ's case, and that they had
caused the foamy casts. Foamy casts have not been causally connected
to the presence of P. carinii in the lung-foamy casts are frequently
seen in emergency rooms accompanying a sudden, often fatal,
hypotensive cardio-pulmonary event.
Because PCP was the centerpiece of the coroner's AIDS
diagnosis, there should have been a rigorous characterization of
quantity of P. carinii in the ME report. First of all, the ME did not
count P. carinii in 1 ml of fluid, or in tissue. They just looked at
a slide with a stain on it-the ME only did a qualitative, and not
quantitative analysis for the presence of P.carinii. Therefore, we
have no idea how many organisms of P. carinii there were in the
tissue. In the absence of inflammation, fibrosis, or quantification,
the conclusion cannot be drawn that Eliza Jane had a large,
established, or even widespread infection with P. carinii.
Nor can we know if the particular micro-organisms or
strain of P. carinii detected in her lung was of any harm to her at
all, or that they were responsible for forming the foamy casts. It is
widely known that P. carinii cannot be cultured, and therefore, any
potential cytopathic effect these organisms may have on living cells
has not been established to date. As mentioned above, foamy casts are
not specific to P. carinii, and are seen in cardiopulmonary collapse
with high frequency. P. carinii is nearly ubiquitous in humans, and
only rarely becomes a problem in a subpopulation of
immunocompromised hosts. No one in their right mind would assume that
the presence of the organism, especially in the absence of pneumonia
or absence of fibrosis in an immunocompetent host (or the absence of
shortness of breath-her pediatricians in the weeks leading up to her
death noted that her lungs were clear-(1, 2) equals a lethal
case of PCP.
Animal models of the disease have been attempted, and
show, for example, that P. carinii in "SIV"-infected
Macaques is accompanied by a massive influx of neutrophils in the
lung (87). As stated above, the ME saw no inflammatory
response in the foamy exudates of Eliza Jane, and in fact, she was
neutropenic (Neutrophil %=12: Normal=45-74%). Although "SIV"
isn't "HIV," "SAIDS" is not like "AIDS,"
and macaques aren't nearly as related phylogenetically or socially to
humans as are chimps, there is no literature on PCP in chimps,
because chimps do not develop AIDS, even after injection with
end-stage AIDS-patient sera. In fact, it is known that chimps
are completely left unharmed by “HIV” "isolates, or
"AIDS-patient sera," because in the past 23 years since
they were first inoculated with AIDS patient's sera, not one of them
has developed “AIDS,” as they continue to sit in their 27 million
dollar retirement homes (88).
In theory, at least, it would be expected that a
microbial pathological infection in a non-immunocompromised
host, such as Eliza Jane, would present with an inflammatory response
(which wasn't present according to the coroner), and/or with fibrosis
(which also wasn't present in the lung according to the coroner). In
support of the fact that polysaccharide residues that form fibrous
structures in diseased tissues are a principal hallmark of chronic
disease, and a principal cause of resistance within pathological
communities of microorganisms, similar to what we observe in
malignant tumors (and their metastases) containing vasculogenic
mimicry patterns (89-96), it has been long established that
like malignant tumors harboring fibrotic extracellular matrix
patterns, that multicellular colonies of micro-organisms also produce
biofilms made of cells suspended in polysaccharaide matrices that are
highly impervious to antibiotics, metals, radiation, as well as
extreme changes in pH, oxygen tension, and heat. These biofilms that
form fibrosis are important in human pathology because:
As reviewed by Harrison et al. (97):
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
estimates that up to 70 percent of the human infections in the
Western world are caused by biofilms. This includes diseases such as
prostatitis and kidney infections, as well as illnesses associated
with implanted medical devices such as artificial joints and
catheters and the dental diseases—both tooth decay and gum
disease—that arise from dental plaque, a biofilm. In the lungs of
cystic fibrosis patients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa frequently forms
biofilms that cause potentially lethal pneumonias. There is a long
list of biofilm related ailments."
"In almost all instances, the biofilm plays a
central role in helping microbes survive or spread within the host.
That¢s because the slimy matrix acts as a shield, protecting
pathogenic bacteria from antibodies and white blood cells, the
sentinels of the immune system. Biofilms are also notorious for their
ability to withstand extraordinarily high concentrations of
antibiotics that are otherwise lethal in smaller doses to their
planktonic counterparts. In fact, a biofilm can be 10 to 1,000 times
less susceptible to an antimicrobial substance than the same organism
in suspension."
Therefore, there is no evidence that a pathological PCP
infection was established in the lungs of Eliza Jane, if indeed the
particular strain of P. carinii was at all pathogenic in her. Thus,
the observation of the ME, that an undetermined quantity of a
ubiquitous organism found in the lungs of healthy persons (P.
carinii) amidst foamy casts in the lungs of Eliza Jane, can most
likely be attributed to detection of a ubiquitous organism awash in
proteins leaked from the vasculature, that became pooled, and highly
oxygenated near the time of her death, as a result of sudden
system-wide vascular permeability caused by an amoxicillin delayed
adverse reaction. Association is not causation, and as we warn
medical students, the following scenario must always be foremost in
the mind of a pathologist working up a differential diagnosis, or
before advancing a new hypothesis regarding an association between
cause X, and a disease syndrome Y:
"In New York City, during the summer, the
sidewalks get hot from the sun and crack more frequently than they do
in the winter. Also during the summer there is a higher rate of
infant mortality. Therefore, cracking sidewalks cause a higher infant
mortality rate in New York during the summertime."
The presence and mere association of P. carinii in foamy
casts in lung tissue does not mean that the P. carinii organisms
induced the foamy casts, or pneumonia, or death, especially in the
absence of inflammation, neutrophils, or fibrosis, and in the
presence of 10,800 lymphocytes/microliter.
NO
EVIDENCE OF "HIV ENCEPHALOPATHY" IN ELIZA JANE.
The UCLA neuropathologist's brain findings of
"HIV-encephalopathy" failed to take into account the well
known non-specificity of p24 antigen even among living people, not to
mention deceased persons. With respect to the
certainty of diagnosing "HIV/AIDS," the CDC and the medical
literature lists flu, flu vaccination, hepatitis B, hepatitis B
vaccination, high levels of circulating immune complexes, high
antibody affinity for polystyrene used in different test kits,
anti-carbohydrate antibodies, anti-collagen antibodies, lipemic
serum, non-specific detection of free ribonucleoproteins,
hypergammaglobulinemia, HLA antibodies
(to Class I and II leukocyte antigens), having
more than one child (multiparous pregnancy is the technical term),
herpes simplex I and II, exposure to alpha interferon therapy,
arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcoholic and other forms of
hepatitis, leprosy, scleroderma,
connective tissue disease, dermatomyostitis, tuberculosis, some
malarial infections, hemophilia, hemodialysis hyperbilirubinemia, the
presence of some malignant neoplasms, mycobacteriaum avium, organ
transplantation, other retroviruses, multiple transfusions, Q-fever
with associated hepatitis, primary billiary cirrhosis, primary
sclerosing cholangitis, renal failure, Stevens-Johnson syndrome,
chronic drug addiction or alcoholism, or visceral leishmaniasis (and
about 40 other) as factors that have been shown to generate false
positive "HIV" tests. There are some
of 70 known risk factors for testing "HIV" false-positive
(a complete list can be found in Reference 3
page 11).
50 % of dogs also show structural
proteins such as p24 thought to be specific for “HIV” and never
develop AIDS (98).
Also goats, and cow milk also induced the expression of the p24
antigen (99).
Also the thymus glands of "HIV-negative"
children are known to express p24 and other so-called “HIV-specific”
markers (100).
From the beginning of the AIDS
era, the non-specificity of p24 and other surrogate markers for "HIV"
have been widely appreciated, even by proponents of the "HIV=AIDS"
hypothesis and members of the AIDS establishment. Thus, the need for
a gold standard for diagnosis and disease staging in "HIV/AIDS"
is particularly acute. From the beginning of the AIDS era, the
literature indicates that because the proper isolation and
purification of an exogenous "HIV" virus itself has not
been possible (86, 101, 102).
Josephson et al. (103)
reported the results of a Western Blot study, in which they claimed:
"Despite the fact the the
majority of p24-and p24/25-indeterminate specimens exhibited specific
antibody reactiviy with HIV core antigen, there was no evidence
linking this reactivity to HIV infection. On
the contrary, based on available data and limited patient
information, we predict that HIV infection was not the cause in most
cases."
With these kinds of considerations, then, how can people
claim to have isolated pure proteins or nucleic acid sequences from
an exogenous retrovirus, and use this material to generate reagents
to test pathological specimens, when the viral particles they
supposedly comprise cannot itself be isolated according to the
discoverer of "HIV" (LAV), or shown to induce a consistent
cytopathogenic effect on cells in vitro (104-112)?
Then what are the test kits used
for if not as tests to selectively bias or confirm those individuals
whom AIDS establishment folks believe live with behavioral risk
factors or who belong to a certain demographic membership? Although
the kits were originally used to protect the blood supply, the
evidence I will present below demonstrates that selective bias is the
principal reason for the existence and widespread use of the tests
currently. Suffice it to say for now, as grave as an "HIV"
or "AIDS" diagnosis and subsequent death sentence is, one
might expect there should be widely publicized attempts to alert the
public about the lack of a gold standard (standard virus isolation).
Or one might minimally expect, if the test kits predict progression
to an "AIDS-defining illness," and regardless of whether
you believe the evidence shows that "HIV/AIDS" is an
endogenous or exogenously acquired syndrome, that at least one test
kit type or brand available of the more than 31 on the market, by
itself, can serve as a gold standard to identify individuals who
carry specific proteins, antibodies or nucleic acids of the "HIV"
endogenous/exogenous "virus-like particle" itself.
I believe the evidence supports
the probability that Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos
et al., Dr. de Harven, and others were correct to propose that these
kinds of qualifications also present us with an intractable paradox
regarding any recommendation that advocates universal testing, or
believing recommendations from studies which identify cohorts in
clinical trails on the basis of these tests (or statistical surveys
based on antibody tests), or results gained from drug treatment
trials. Nor will the proliferation of recent rapid test kits that
claim to have been validated by comparing positive or negative (or
indeterminate) outcomes against the more widely used and
non-validated test kits such as Abbott's, Epitope's, or Roche's
increase the certainty of "HIV" diagnosis, if, or until, a
gold standard is developed against which all kit results can be
validated, which is true virus isolation itself.
GIANT
MULTINUCLEATED CELLS IN THE BRAIN.
It was claimed by the coroner that giant multinucleated
cells were observed microscopically in the Brain of Eliza Jane. Dr.
Al-Bayati's report presented information explaining how it is
generally believed these cells form from the fusion of immune cells
(glial cells) due to a variety of factors. For example, during an
acute reaction to a drug that causes systemic vascular permeability
and leakage of non-resident proteins in the perivascular areas of the
brain, it is not far fetched to suppose that glial cells would try to
absorb the insult, and in the process, become fused together to form
giant multinucleated cells visible upon microscopic examination. Not
much is known regarding adverse reactions to amoxicillin.
Adopting the orthodox view of "HIV"
encephalapathy for a moment, and that giant cells are created via
fusion of cells by "HIV" (rather than extravasated proteins
leaked from the vasculature due to the insult of amoxicillin), it
should be asked exactly how does "HIV" induce cell fusion
of brain glial cells or macrophages? At the cellular level, if you
believe "HIV" is an exogenous virus and dispute the
evidence that "HIV" viral-like particles, or "HIV"
sequences are evoked endogenously via oxidation as I have presented
evidence in support of, it is still not established in the
experimental literature if "HIV," or whatever you call it,
can fuse cells of any kind together, especially at the titers that
are thought to be present in end-stage "AIDS" patients
(quite low to the point of not being detectable by many accounts).
Again, it was Gallo¢s group that first published
data claiming that "HIV" induces a "syncytial
cytopathic effect" (cell fusion) in vitro (113),
amidst their claims that the cytopathic effects of "HIV,"
when they are observed in T-cell cultures, are most likely caused by
the many activating (oxidizing) agents to which the cultures (or some
"AIDS" patients) are exposed. Yet these data were derived
from a cancer cell line instead of normal peripheral lymphocytes,
established from a patient with mature T4-cell leukemia, and this
could account for this phenomenon (79).
"The virus positive
cultures consistently showed a high proportion of round giant cells
containing numerous nuclei", (syncytia)."
However, it subsequently became
widely appreciated that the HT line used by Gallo is in fact the
HUT78 cancer cell line (114, 115,
116).
If cancer cells are used to
generate "HIV infections" in vitro, then what relevance
does this have in explaining the behavior of normal lymphocytes, or
when one identifies giant multinucleated cells in vivo in a person
without cancer?
It should be acknowledged, in
addition, that leukemia cells or even normal lymphocytes treated with
toxic factors such as PHA or stimulated to produce IL2 which are both
toxic oxidizing agents to normal peripheral T-cells, may promote
either normal or cancer cells to undergo endoreplication (leading to
supernumerary nuclei), and is not representative of the environment
of normal lymphocytes, glial cells, or normal cells in Petri dishes,
or in humans. But tissue culture artifacts are fun to study-sometimes
even fantastic claims can be advanced in first-line journals, by
simply watching cells with multiple nuclei move, as long as HIV is
somewhere involved (118).
However, the cellular mechanisms for cell fusion, are known, and even
"exogenous HIV," if it could be shown to exist, doesn't
provide the necessary fusigenic properties or conditions for fusion
thought to exist in end-stage "AIDS" patients, if only
because "HIV" has traditionally been impossible to
"isolate" even from end-stage "AIDS" patients,
let alone in sufficient titer, if it were an exogenous virus like
Sendai virus, that can induce cell fusion.
INVOLUTED
THYMUS AND SPLEEN ATROPHY.
Eliza Jane¢s thymus and spleen weights were measured
as being 8g and 40 g, which are 32% and 85% of their normal expected
weight for her size (1). There was fibrosis detected in the
thymus, which according to the coroner, was involuted. The spleen
was also said to exhibit a reduction in the white pulp in the
coroners report (1). An infection such as a severe earache, or
3 week-long upper respiratory infection, adrenalin overdose, or
stress to the system of any kind can induce the formation of an
involuted thymus containing fibrosis, or apparent atrophy of the
spleen. In his report, Dr. Al-Bayati provides well substantiated
references and arguments in his report that a at least 130 different
illnesses or syndromes of less than 5 day duration can cause stress
and release cortisol, causing the thymus to "involute, and that
the degree of involution is dependent upon the duration of the
illness" (13). In this context, it is of interest that
even the non-specificity of "HIV" markers such as p24 have
also been documented in the context of thymus involution in
"HIV-negative" persons (119):
" …There
were no major differences between thymus tissue in AIDS patients and
in the other patients studied.
This argues against the claim
expressed in the literature that the epithelial microenvironment
incurs particular HIV-1-induced injury in AIDS.
This conclusion is substantiated by immunohistochemistry for HIV-1
gag and env proteins, and by hybridohistochemistry for gag/pol and
env mRNA of HIV-1. Positive cells were observed only in low numbers,
both inside the epithelial parenchyma and in the (expanded)
perivascular areas. An
interesting finding was the labeling of subcapsular/medullary
epithelium in normal uninvoluted thymus by a number of antibodies to
HIV-1 gag p17 and p24 proteins.
Compatible with this labeling was the staining of epithelial stalks
in hyperinvoluted thymuses irrespective of disease category. The
previously reported cross-reactivity between HIV-1 core protein and
thymosin alpha 1 cannot fully explain this observation, because the
epithelium in the hyperinvoluted state is negative for thymosin alpha
1. This study confirms and extends previous reports on the endogenous
presence of epitopes of retroviral antigens in thymic epithelium."
Although the possible effects of
her prior upper-respiratory infection and earache on thymus atrophy
and spleen atrophy should not be ignored or dismissed as
contributory, it should here again be emphasized, that Eliza Jane¢s
lymphocyte count of 10,800 lymphocytes/µl precludes her from even
being considered immune suppressed. Perhaps what could account
for these findings of both an atrophied thymus and spleen, as well as
fat accumulation in the liver (as this was also detected), is the use
of amoxicillin. In preclinical mammalian studies of young rodents,
for example, it was established that a short course of amoxicillin
therapy specifically can affect the size and morphological
characteristics of the thymus, spleen, and form fat in the liver at
the same time, and can even cross the blood brain barrier to affect
these simultaneous changes in the weights of these three organs
(120). Few studies, however, have
specifically looked at changes in these organs in the context of
amoxicillin adverse reactions in humans (since they typically aren¢t
even reported or suspected, and are typically dismissed).
A
related hypothesis, however, could explain these simultaneous
changes, as well as the increase in measured lymphocyte count of
10,800 lymphocytes/µl in a non-immunosuppressed individual showing
atrophy of the thymus and spleen. Eliza Jane¢s excessive lymphocyte
numbers measured at the hospital had to have come from somewhere. A
likely place was from either the thymus or the spleen or both. In
this regard, there is a developed literature on how beta-lactams
activate lymphocytes. Thus, it is possible that the excess number of
lymphocytes measured in her peripheral circulation were derived from
her thymus and spleen, or one or both of these organs (in the context
of a post-upper-respiratory infection or earache), during the 36 hour
amoxicillin delayed reaction she appears to have experienced.
For example, her elevated
10,800 lymphocytes/µl count obtained at
the hospital on the day of her death is consistent with the
possibility that after she imbibed the first dose of amoxicillin, her
immune system went into high gear, judging by the parent's and
emergency response team's descriptions of her acute symptoms (2).
It might also be mentioned that consistent with the acute
amoxicillin-induced lymphocyte increases, vascular permeability, and
tissue destruction, studies have shown that T-cells are reactive in
delayed amoxicillin hypersensitivity reactions. In this
regard, there is a developed literature that documents how
amoxicillin potentiates T-cells to kill other cells specifically in
delayed hypersensitivity reactions:
"beta-Lactam drugs may
induce both cellular and humoral allergic reactions, and there is
evidence that T cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of
these reactions. The aim of this work was to assess the sensitivity
and specificity of the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) as an in
vitro diagnostic tool, in patients with either an immediate or
a nonimmediate reaction to
penicillin G and/or amoxicillin." (24).
The
authors of this work concluded by stating that:
"The
LTT should be considered a useful in vitro diagnostic tool to
identify subjects allergic to penicillins, especially patients with
nonimmediate reactions where
the LTT has a better diagnostic value than skin tests.
In a similar context, Yawalkar et
al., (121)
concluded that:
"In conclusion, a
substantial part of the T cells in drug-induced epicutaneous test
reactions are drug specific and are composed of a heterogeneous cell
population. Drug-specific T cells producing interleukin-5 may
contribute to eosinophilia,
whereas cytotoxic CD4+ T cells may account for tissue damage.
These data underline the role of T cells in delayed-type cutaneous
adverse drug eruptions and drug-induced epicutaneous test reactions."
NO
FAILURE TO THRIVE AND NOT AIDS-ASSOCIATED WASTING SYNDROME IN ELIZA
JANE.
Her 5th to 10th percentile weight gain from January to
March in 2005 contradicts the possibility that AIDS-related wasting
syndrome or failure to thrive contributed to the death, as has been
suggested by members of the AIDS establishment in their ill-informed
and terse dismissal of Dr. Al-Bayati¢s differential diagnosis (See:
http://catallarchy.net/blog/wp-content/images/A_report_on_Eliza.pdf
). By “wasting,” or “failure to thrive,” it is
generally indicated that people are losing weight, instead of gaining
weight.
DISCUSSION
AND CONCLUSIONS:
From classical times, medical treatments have been
predicated on either a rationalist or empiricist philosophy (122).
Rationalists, as a group, tend to regard and approach disease as a
localized entity and attack "it" directly by attempting to
reduce or reverse its cause or primary symptoms. Radiation,
mainstream chemotherapy, and targeted immune therapy are principal
examples of a rationalist approach. Antiretroviral therapy or HAART
are also examples of the rationalist approach, which employs
Ehrlich's "law of contraries," to target a supposed
exogenous invader, "HIV," that is thought to be responsible
for 46 (47 if you now want to include amoxicillin adverse reactions)
different syndromes that were previously known before "HIV"
was announced by government proclamation as being the sole cause of
"AIDS."
Empiricists tend to regard and approach disease as an
imbalance in the living organism, which they attempt to restore by
aiding the body in re-establishing its lost balance in ways that
increase "resistance," or which non-specifically alert the
organism via a "danger signal." Microbial immune therapy,
antiangiogenesis therapy, and hyperthermic therapy are examples of an
empirical approach. AIDSVAX, the GP120-based "HIV" vaccine
is also an example of an empiricist approach, as it employs "the
law of similars, to provide the organism with a similar substance
(and not target the hypothesized cause directly), to alert the
organism to subdue the exogenous invader, which is "HIV."
Also, reconstitution of the immune system through nutrition therapy
would be considered a form of empiricist therapeutics for immune
suppressed individuals. It should be emphasized that people are not
considered to have an AIDS-defining illness if they have suffered
from chronic starvation, as these individuals are known to possess a
helper T-cell ratio in the AIDS-defining range or even lower (<
250 cells/ml), and can present with as much as a 90% reduction in
their normal T-cell number, that is reversible upon supplying the
proper nutrition and nutritional supplements (123, 124),
as Fauzi et al. have shown in a recent study using vitamin
supplements in the absence of HAART (125).
Both approaches are "scientific”, depending of
course on how an experiment or trial is conducted (whether it is
terminated prematurely as most, if not all of the FDA AZT and other
retroviral trials have been), or if there are consistent results
generated, such as testing "HIV positive," "HIV
positive," and "HIV positive." In science, a finding
that repeats 2 times might be a fluke, while 3 points define a
straight line, and constitute a minimum requirement to establish
'consistency,' or even 'a trend.' Rationalists also perform their
medical experiments on an " average" or idealized patient
harboring some "average" symptoms of "a disease,"
to the extent that even adverse or idiosyncratic reactions to
medications such as amoxicillin are believed to fall into stereotypic
responses, while empiricists perform their medical experiments in an
attempt to restore the apparent imbalance manifested by
person-specific, individualized symptoms that may appear different in
each patient.
But if Eliza Jane had too many lymphocytes at the
hospital to even consider her an immunosuppressed victim, if "HIV"
isn't an exogenous virus, if the cell biology of "HIV"
doesn't make any sense (if in different labs "it" causes
T-cells to apoptose, if "it" doesn't cause T-cells to
apoptose, if "it" causes T-cells to fuse, if "it"
doesn't do anything to T-cells except induce them to make "viral-like
particles" and cause cells to pump out their endogenous
molecules packaged in membrane surrounded vesicles that are surrogate
markers without showing cytopathic effects, if "it" cannot
be photographed from purified bands on a sucrose gradient, if "it"
cannot be shown to cause AIDS in chimps our phylogenetically closest
relative, or even cause transference of “HIV seropositivity in
serodiscordant human couples, like Robin Scovill, if "it"
can't be shown to have consistent biochemical activity in vitro, and
if there are 70 or more syndromes or situations, including 50% of
dogs, or sheep, goats or worms, or Christine Maggiore, that test
positive where "HIV" surrogate markers can be obtained in
the absence of any evidence of immune suppression or any other of the
46 "AIDS-indicator diseases," then neither the rationalist
or empiricist approach makes sense, or will produce results, as
neither have over 22 years, in the treatment of profoundly immune
suppressed individuals that are called "AIDS patients."
If
this is a wrong representation of the facts, why would the Head of
the Virus Reference Laboratory of the British Public Health
Laboratory Service, Dr Philip Mortimer, write that:
“It may be impossible to relate
an antibody response specifically to HIV-1 infection” (126)?
I do not believe that similarities
of adverse reactions on the amoxicillin package inserts, and the
succession of Eliza Jane's 36 hour series of symptoms warrant the
incarceration of Christine Maggiore, Robin Scovill, the removal and
state-remand of Charlie, their "HIV-negative" son, or can
justify the public humiliation and inquisition-style witch hunt
initiated by the coroners office, the LA Times, or ABC Primetime at a
time at what is perhaps the greatest tragedy a family can face.
The evidence suggests that all
adverse reactions of Eliza Jane were consistent with adverse
reactions listed on amoxicillin package inserts, and the succession
of Eliza Jane's 36 hour series of symptoms support the hospital
records, and her prior medical records which do not suggest an "AIDS"
diagnosis in any way, shape, or form. The false charges of potential
parental negligence and the erroneous claims of Eliza Jane as
a child with AIDS are outside the realm of scientific thinking. The
coroner¢s incompetence and extreme negligence prompted local
authorities and the media to debate removal and state-remand of
Charlie, Christine and Robin's "HIV-negative" son.
According to Ms. Maggiore (personal
communication), Charlie had to be subjected to no less than 4
negative “HIV” tests before The State would allow the boy to be
allowed without harassment back into the unsupervised charge of his
mother and father, to grieve the loss of his baby sister. In
this horrible, inquisition-style witch-hunt, an innocent family was
abused by a derelict ME and coroner and press who are fully
responsible for significantly adding to this family's nightmare. We
cannot even trust that the slides showing PC pneumonia and "HIV"
encephalopathy belong to Eliza Jane, as Dr. Ribe is under
investigation for "fixing" at least 5 other cases.
Therefore, we are left with the lymphocyte count obtained upon
admission to the hospital and reports regarding Eliza Jane's apparent
good health preceding her crisis period. In turn, it should be
appreciated that high lymphocyte counts are inconsistent with PCP or
encephalitis or immune suppression of any kind. Eliza Jane's fatal
symptoms appeared immediately after her imbibing amoxicillin.
John
Moore of Weil Medical College is the greatest AIDS denialist of them
all-despite his "HAIL MARY Experiments," he betrayed a
deep-seated AIDS denialism at the 2006 International AIDS conference:
Dr. John Moore of Weil Medical
College, one of the featured speakers in this year's International
Toronto AIDS Conference is an enigmatic character. In a talk he gave
at the 2006 conference about his work, which involves inseminating
rhesus macaques up to 5 times after smearing a microbicide cream in
their vaginas to prevent “SIV,” he claimed that these “HAIL
MARY" experiments (a term used in American football when the
quarterback wildly throws a pass and "prays" somebody will
catch it) hold great promise and could solve the “AIDS apocalypse
in Africa and elsewhere. He claimed that multiple inseminations are
necessary in order to model the frequent sexual activity that goes on
amongst the "filthy humans" that populate these 3rd
World Nations. Not being Catholic or a football fan, I didn¢t
quite understand at first what was meant by the term “HAIL MARY
experiments.” To rigorously prove his “SIV-fighting” spermicide
worked, I gathered that HAIL-MARYING HIS monkeys and inseminating
them 4-5 times represented the fact that his microbicide “absolves”
the monkeys of contracting “SIV,” as one would if a Catholic
perhaps were “absolved of sin” after saying “HAIL MARY”
numerous times as penance? I didn't know it was a football term.
Although “SIV” has always been
a better model of “HIV” than “HIV,” a critic might suggest
Moore try Human “HIV,” perhaps with dogs, cows, goats, sheep, or
non-infected monkeys, chimps, and humans that have naturally
occurring “HIV” sequences (18).
Although none of these animals acquire AIDS from “HIV,” neither
do his monkeys since he is inseminating them with “SIV.”
Because I learned so much about
religion in science at his scientific talk, I listened to another
talk Dr. Moore gave in a session at the Toronto Conference regarding
“AIDS and Responsible Journalism."
It was here that I noticed, however, that AIDS denialism appears to
have infected even some of his thinking, and despite his warnings
about extreme AIDS denialists in a recent Amazon.com book review
where he said that AIDS denialists are:
"scientists whose careers
fizzled out; but others are zealots with extreme political views
(both on the far-right and the far-left) who find AIDS denialism
politically convenient; and some are deeply troubled individuals with
disturbing behavior patterns who
deserve pity and professional help."
Allow me to give one example
illustrating Moore's denialism. In his AIDS denialism, Dr. Moore
described the case of Christine Maggiore, and the recent tragic death
of her daughter, Eliza Jane. Dr. Moore then suggested that Ms.
Maggiore and her partner, Robin Scovill, had been irresponsible and
negligent parents regarding the raising of their children, and that a
responsible press ought to mercilessly and unabashedly punish the
parents for Ms. Maggiore's minimizing or ignoring her possible
“HIV-positive” status, for her alleged subsequent infecting and
killing her daughter with "HIV," and for both parents
refusal to give either of their children or themselves (any more)
"HIV" tests, or HAART, in the 3 years preceding the child's
tragic amoxicillin-induced death.
However, a little research into the matter would have
clearly revealed the depth of this type of AIDS denialism and
stigmatization (to quote Malinda Gates warning against
stigmatization) that was distastefully, and I would say, angrily
advanced, by Dr. Moore. But that is how AIDS denialism works on even
some of the best minds, which, as Moore himself has said, "deserve
pity and professional help." Like "the virus that
causes AIDS" itself, AIDS denialism can infect even the most
faithful "HIV=AIDS" promoters, which is why I guess they
say AIDS denialism it is so insidious. For instance, Moore's
ill-informed suggestion to the AIDS and Responsible Journalism
session, that a Salem Witch Trial for Ms. Maggiore and her family be
intensively pursued, was nothing less than unparalleled arrogance and
a publicly-presented savage abuse of their human rights, their rights
as U.S. citizens, stigmatization, and, most woefully perhaps, his
tantrum bent the logic of the "HIV=AIDS” paradigm. Dr. Moore's
effort to malign these parents using his scientific credentials and
considerable skill and reputation to motivate the press to use its
influence to pelt the Maggiore-Scovill Family with insults, threats,
and other unimaginable forms of torment in the aftermath of the
tragic death of the little girl, constitutes an extreme form of AIDS
denialism (this was after all an AIDS and Responsible Journalism
Session).
Before maligning Ms. Maggiore and Robin Scovill on stage
before the entire world, a little research of Eliza Jane's hospital
admission data that was published in the respected journal, Medical
Veritas, and in the Coroner's report posted all over the Internet
would have demonstrated to Dr. Moore instantly that Eliza Jane could
not have died of AIDS. In this scenario, if
Eliza Jane had AIDS, it would mean that A ("HIV") may cause
an increase in B (immune system increase), which leads to C
(AIDS-indicator diseases). Despite Gallo's, Montagnier's, "HIV"
test kit makers, vaccine makers, drug makers, and other AIDS
denialist constructions and distortions of the correct "HIV=AIDS"
hypothesis, this form of AIDS denialism is perhaps the most insidious
and horrifying of all, not only because it threatens both the freedom
and Human rights of those accused of being "HIV-positive,"
but particularly, because it distorts the “HIV= AIDS paradigm
completely in the wrong direction.
In this scenario,
A (“HIV”)------leads to B
(10,800lymphocytes/microliter)-----leads to C (PCP, “HIV”
encephalopathy).
To address the issue of why absolute lymphocytes versus
CD4/CD8 ratios weren't measured before the coroners were made aware
of Christine Maggiore's (inconsistent) "HIV-positive status,"
and before the coroners changed their initial “indeterminate”
cause of death, and deemed Eliza Jane an "AIDS statistic,"
it is clear that there was no reason for anyone to assume that in
Eliza Jane's case, they were dealing with an immune suppressed
individual. Her acute symptoms during her 36-hour death appeared to
be due to a hyper-immune reaction to a prescribed drug,
and an earache. However, despite the coroner's failure to provide a
CD4+/CD8+ ratio in support of the "AIDS diagnosis," it
should be emphasized in this context as well that the accuracy of
total lymphocyte counts in predicting death due to "AIDS-associated
indicator diseases" is considered equal or even superior to
measuring the CD4/CD8 ratio (94). Therefore, and
despite the fact that an "HIV" test or CD4/CD8 ratios were
NOT obtained (by those attributing her death to AIDS after the
revised autopsy report was filed some 4 months after the death),
absolute lymphocyte numbers WERE obtained at the hospital, and
according to "AIDS experts," are just as predictive of
AIDS-related death in children, if not more so. In a recent study of
3917 children, it was reported that:
“For
children older than 2 years, the 12-month risk of death and AIDS
increased sharply at values less than 1500-2000 cells per microliter,
with
little trend at higher values.”
(Eliza Jane's count was 10,800 cells/microliter).
“Mortality risk was
substantially higher at thresholds of total lymphocyte count
recommended by WHO than at corresponding thresholds of CD4-cell
percentage. When the markers were compared at the threshold values at
which mortality risks were about equal, total lymphocyte count was as
effective as CD4-cell percentage for identifying children before
death…”
In the context of lymphocyte numbers, and despite
occasional and minor discord in "AIDS science meetings amongst
the very smartest "HIV=AIDS" promoters about the precise
molecular mechanism that explains why low lymphocyte numbers are seen
in end-stage "AIDS" patients (is it really "the Gut"
stupid, how quickly does "HIV" cause heart disease, or
infect neuronal macrophages, kidneys, liver, etc.), "HIV=AIDS"
scientists are as certain today that low, rather than high
lymphocyte numbers have something to do with full-blown "AIDS,"
as they are about gravity being caused by those little graviton
particles.
By attributing Eliza Jane's death to AIDS, Dr. Moore has
in effect, "denied the cause of gravity," because if Eliza
Jane had "HIV" and 10,800 lymphocytes/microliter at the
time of her death, then A ("HIV") would have had to have to
led to a massive stimulation or overproduction of B (immune cell
numbers-10,800 lymphocytes/microliter), instead of a decrease in B
(to a 1000 or less meeting the WHO surveillance definition shown
above), to induce C (the PC pneumonia and "HIV"
encephalopathy that was missed by the first coroners but determined 4
months later by Dr. Ribe-who is now under intense investigation for
lying in other reports that have led to the life-time convictions of
innocent parents). To assume that "AIDS" is caused by too
many lymphocytes, is taking "HIV=AIDS" completely in the
wrong direction. AIDS is a disease showing too few lymphocytes, not
too many, like cancer.
Thus in maligning Ms. Maggiore and her family before the
world stage, John Moore, perhaps in a weak moment, betrayed his
deep-seated AIDS denialism to the Toronto Conference, to the shame of
all of humanity.
For these and a myriad other
reasons, it is wrong to assume Eliza Jane died of "AIDS,"or
to continue to vilify or attempt to coerce or harass Christine
Maggiore, Robin Scovill, and their 8 year-old son, Charlie.
Addendum:
AUGUST 15 - 21, 2003
Web of Deceit
Murder conviction overturned
because D.A. withheld evidence
by Jim Crogan
A state appellate court has
overturned the murder conviction of Jose Salazar for killing an
infant girl in 1996, ruling that the L.A. County District Attorney¢s
Office deliberately concealed information from the defense about a
deputy coroner¢s mistakes, his altered findings and changed
testimony in other homicide cases.
The case against Salazar had
focused on the timing of the child¢s injuries. Since that timeline
was in dispute, and no forensic evidence or eyewitness tied him to
the crime, the appeals court determined that the introduction of
Deputy Coroner James Ribe¢s credibility problems would likely have
produced a different verdict.
The unanimous decision was
handed down last week. The three-judge panel also ordered the case
returned to the trial court. But the District Attorney¢s Office has
not yet said if it will retry the case. The 2nd Appellate District
underscored its anger at the D.A.¢s Office by publishing the
opinion, meaning it can be cited as a precedent by defense attorneys,
and naming names of the offending parties.
Gail Harper, Salazar¢s
appellate attorney, said the oral arguments in June signaled victory.
“The judges patiently listened to me. Then they challenged the
deputy attorney general, representing the D.A., to explain why
sanctions shouldn¢t be issued for this deliberate Brady violation.”
Under the U.S. Supreme Court¢s
1963 Brady v. Maryland decision, prosecutors must turn over
potentially exculpatory evidence to defense attorneys. Withholding
such favorable evidence violates a person¢s right to a fair trial.
“The D.A.¢s Office has this ¡win at any cost¢ attitude.
Publishing it and naming names is the only way you get these folks¢
attention,” Harper says. “They don¢t give a damn about their
legal obligations. I hope attorneys in other Ribe cases are lining up
to file appeals.”
Salazar was sentenced to 15
years to life for killing Adriana Krygoski. He volunteered to watch
her while the babysitter went shopping. He was the boyfriend of the
sitter¢s daughter and lived with them. Witnesses testified that the
child had two visible head bruises when her mother dropped her off,
but otherwise appeared to be healthy. The toddler then hit her head
on a coffee table while Salazar¢s girlfriend was with her.
When the infant awoke from her
nap, she started vomiting. Salazar said he tried to help, but
eventually called 911. At the hospital, doctors discovered two skull
fractures. Ribe testified that the injuries were consistent with
violent shaking or hitting a flat surface. The injuries, he said,
would have rendered Adriana “instantaneously” unconscious.
Without treatment, death would have followed within a few minutes or
a few hours. The defense¢s medical expert strongly disagreed,
arguing that the injuries could have occurred hours earlier. But
Ribe¢s timeline focused suspicion on Salazar.
Prosecutors intentionally
withheld information about Ribe¢s inconsistent testimony in other
child-death cases, particularly the 1995 beating death of 2
1/2-year-old Lance Helms. The issues in that case closely match those
in Salazar¢s.
In the Helms case, Ribe
testified that death occurred within “30 to 60 minutes” of his
injuries. The boy¢s mother, Eve Wingfield, was with him when he
died. Wingfield¢s public defender then persuaded her to plead
guilty to a lesser charge of child abuse. Ribe later changed his mind
and told detectives the boy died immediately after the beating. The
LAPD reopened the case in 1996 and charged Helms¢ father. David
Helms was convicted of murder, and Wingfield was released. An appeal
is pending, and Harper says the appellate court requested she
investigate potential Brady violations in that case.
The appellate court also
highlighted other Ribe cases. At the 1996 trial of Roberto Cauchi,
for the torture-murder of a child, Ribe changed his earlier
preliminary-hearing testimony, introducing unexpected evidence of
sexual abuse and “shaken baby” syndrome. In the 1996
gunshot-murder trial of Sean Hand, Ribe changed his preliminary
testimony about the wounds and time of death. In the 1996 trial of
Charles Rathbun, Ribe changed his conclusion on the cause of Linda
Sobek¢s death from inconclusive to strangulation. In the 1996
“shaken baby” death trial of Destiny Jacobo, Ribe admitted
missing two bruises and changed his conclusions about the time of
death. In the 1997 stabbing-death trial of Lorrie Tuccinardi, Ribe
changed his testimony about the wounds. At a 1997 preliminary hearing
for Edith Arce and Rene Urbano, in a child-murder case, Ribe
testified that he changed his mind about a bruise, saying it came
from a blow, not a bedsore.
Appellate Judge J. Gary
Hastings wrote, “The duty of disclosure [exculpatory material by
prosecutors] does not end when the trial is over.” Hastings also
detailed the efforts taken by Deputy D.A. Jennifer Turkat, who
prosecuted Salazar; her supervisor, Alan Yochelson; his supervisor,
Roger Gunson; and the D.A.¢s Office to stonewall Salazar¢s
defense, Harper, and even Deputy D.A. Dinko Bozanich, the prosecutor
of the Arce/Urbano case.
Ultimately, it was Bozanich, a
veteran prosecutor, who exposed this web of deceit. In 1999, he gave
Harper an affidavit on his investigation into Ribe and the D.A.¢s
repeated failure to disclose exculpatory evidence. In his opinion,
this revealed “intolerable and unethical practices at the highest
levels of our office.”
Harper says it was Bozanich¢s
stand that helped her discover the truth. And Gigi Gordon, a veteran
defense attorney and acknowledged Brady expert, says, “Dinko is the
real hero here. He broke the code of silence inside the D.A.¢s
Office.”
Bozanich says he only did what
prosecutors must do ethically. “What happened here sends an awful
message to young prosecutors and the public,” he explains. “When
prosecutors do something wrong, sanctions should follow.” Bozanich
says it¢s evidence of a “just win, baby” philosophy that
developed during Gil Garcetti¢s tenure. “I¢m sorry to say,
nothing has changed under Steve Cooley.”
But Lael Rubin, a special
counsel to D.A. Cooley who helped establish his office¢s Brady
Policy and Alert System for prosecutors to check out witnesses,
insists things are better. “If the office had our Brady policy in
place prior to December 2000, this case would have been handled very
differently.”
But the Cooley administration
has been in office for two years, and it could have told the court
that Garcetti¢s position was a mistake. Yet it didn¢t. “We just
got the Salazar decision this week,” responds Rubin.
And what of the Brady Alert
System? Is Ribe¢s name included? “No, I don¢t think so,” she
answers. “Our system is not totally complete.”
REFERENCES:
1. Autopsy report (Case No 2005-0367), Department of
Coroner, Los Angeles California. September 15, 2005.
2. Medical record # 856441, Valley Presbyterian
Hospital, 15107 Vanowen Street, Van Nuys, Ca, 91404.
3. Christine Maggiore. What if
everything you thought you knew about AIDS was wrong? American
Foundation for AIDS Alterntives. 4th
Printing, 2000.
4. Liam Scheff. Orphans on trial.
New York Press, July 2004, or at
http://nypress.com/print.cfm?content_id=10614,
July, 2004 (photographic documentation in this reference).
5. Liam Scheff. Still on trial.
New York Press, Vol. 18, Issue 5, February 2-8, 2005.
6. Gary Matsumoto. Vaccine A: The
covert government experiment that's killing our soldiers and why GI's
are only the first victims. Basic Books, 2004.
7. John Crewdson: Gallo
Case, Truth Termed A Casualty Report: Science Subverted in AIDS
Dispute; Chicago Tribune (CT) - SUNDAY, January 1, 1992 from the
Dingell Report):
8. John
Solomon "AIDS Research Chief Rewrote Safety Report.",
Associated Press, Tuesday, December 4, 2004
(http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,141515,00.html).
9. Charles Ornstein, Daniel
Costello, A Mother's Denial, a Daughter's Death, LA Times, September
24, 2005.
10.
Al-Bayati M. Get all the facts: HIV does not cause AIDS. Toxi-Health
International, 1999. (ISBN 0-9673536-0-2; Library of Congress Card
Number: SMS-7-8-99).
11. Fauci, A.S. Mechanisms of
Corticosteroid Action on lymphocyte Subpopulations I. Redistribution
of circulating T and B lymphocytes to the bone marrow. Immunology 28:
669-679, 1975.
12. Fauci, A.S., Dale, D.C., and
Balow, J.E. Glucocorticosteroid therapy: Mechanisms of Action and
Clinical Considerations. Annals of Internal Medicine 84: 304-15,
1976.
13.
Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati. Analysis of causes that led to Eliza Jane
Scovill¢s cardiac arrest and death. Medical Veritas 2(2005)
567-581.
14. Bull World Health Organ.
38(2):159-88, 1968.
15. da Fonseca Pediatr Dent.
Adverse reaction to amoxicillin: a case report. Sep-Oct;22(5):401-4,
209, 2000.
16. Gomes et al. Self-reported
drug allergy in a general adult Portuguese population. Clin Exp
Allergy. Oct;34(10):1597-601, 2004.
17. Getov I, Dimitrova Z.
Antibacterials: spontaneous report analysis for a six years period in
Bulgaria. Boll Chim Farm. Apr;138(4):186-90, 1999.
18. Minguez MA, Zapatero L, Caloto
M, Martinez-Molero MI. A study of allergy to penicillin antibiotics
in 1995 in the Child Allergy Department of the Gregorio Maranon
University hospital. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr).
Mar-Apr;26(2):43-6, 1998.
19. Romano A, Viola M, Mondino C,
Pettinato R, Di Fonso M, Papa G, Venuti A, Montuschi P.Int Arch
Allergy Immunol. Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by
in vivo tests. 1: Int Arch Allergy Immunol. Oct;129(2):169-74, 2002.
20. Romano A, Quaratino D, Di
Fonso M, Papa G, Venuti A, Gasbarrini G.A diagnostic protocol for
evaluating nonimmediate reactions to aminopenicillins. J Allergy Clin
Immunol. Jun;103(6):1186-90, 1999.
21. Romano A, Blanca M, Torres MJ,
Bircher A, Aberer W, Brockow K, Pichler WJ, Demoly P; ENDA; EAACI.
Diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics.
Allergy. Nov; 59(11):1153-60, 2004.
22. Barbaud AM, Bene MC, Schmutz
JL, Ehlinger A, Weber M, Faure GC. Role of delayed cellular
hypersensitivity and adhesion molecules in amoxicillin-induced
morbilliform rashes. Arch Dermatol. Apr;133(4):481-6, 1997.
23.Terrados S, Blanca M, Garcia J,
Vega J, Torres MJ, Carmona MJ, Miranda A, Moya M, Juarez C, Fernandez
J. Nonimmediate reactions to betalactams: prevalence and role of the
different penicillins. Allergy. Jul;50(7):563-7, 1995.
24.Luque I, Leyva L, Jose Torres
M, Rosal M, Mayorga C, Segura JM, Blanca M, Juarez C. In vitro T-cell
responses to beta-lactam drugs in immediate and nonimmediate allergic
reactions. Allergy. Jul;56(7):611-8, 2001.
25.Torres MJ, Sanchez-Sabate E,
Alvarez J, Mayorga C, Fernandez J, Padial A, Cornejo-Garcia JA,
Bellon T, Blanca M. Skin test evaluation in nonimmediate allergic
reactions to penicillins. Allergy. Feb;59(2):219-24, 2004.
26. Romano A, Di Fonso M,
Pocobelli D, Giannarini L, Venuti A, Garcovich A; Two cases of toxic
epidermal necrolysis caused by delayed hypersensitivity to
beta-lactam antibiotics. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol.
Jan-Feb;3(1):53-5, 1993.
27. Fernandez de Corres L, Lobera
I, Munoz D. Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity from penicillin.
Contact Dermatitis. Mar;14(3):194-5, 1986.
28. Olaison L,
Belin L, Hogevik H, Alestig K.
Incidence of beta-lactam-induced delayed hypersensitivity and
neutropenia during treatment of infective endocarditis. Arch Intern
Med. Mar 22;159(6):607-15, 1999.
29. Amoxicillin Package inserts:
-Part 2: Summary Statements
Evidence-Based Commentary - VII. Prototypes Of Immunologically
Mediated Drug Hypersensitivity Ann Allergy 1999; 83:S665-S700
www.jcaai.org/pp/dh_7_prototypes.asp
30. Hautekeete ML
Hepatotoxicity of antibiotics. Acta Gastroenterol Belg.
May-Aug;58(3-4):290-6, 1995.
31. George DK, Crawford DH.
Antibacterial-induced hepatotoxicity. Incidence, prevention and
management.Drug Saf. Jul;15(1):79-85, 1996.
32. Brown SJ, Desmond PV.
Hepatotoxicity of antimicrobial agents.
Semin Liver Dis. 22(2):157-67,
2002.
33. Liu ZX, Kaplowitz N.
Immune-mediated drug-induced liver disease. Clin Liver Dis.
Aug;6(3):755-74, 2002.
34.Berg P, Hahn EG. Hepatotoxic
reactions induced by beta-lactamase inhibitors. Eur
J Med Res. Dec 17;6(12):535-42, 2001.
35. Valyasevi MA, Van Dellen RG.
Frequency of systematic reactions to penicillin skin tests. Ann
Allergy Asthma Immunol. Nov;85(5):363-5), 2000.
36. Reig Rincon de Arellano I,
Villalon Garcia A, Cimarra Alvarez-Lovell M, Robledo Echarren T,
Martinez-Cocera M. Allergol
Immunopathol. Flare up to
betalactams. Sep-Oct;33(5):282-4, 2005.
37. JD
Hamilton et. al. and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. A
controlled trial of early versus late treatment with zidovudine in
symptomatic human immunodifficiency virus infection. New England
Journal of Medicine, 326: 437-434, 1992.
38. Seligmann et al., Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised
double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in
symptom-free HIV infection. Concorde Coordinating Committee. Lancet,
Apr 9;343(8902):871-81, 1994.
39.
de Martino et al., Rapid disease progression in HIV-1 perinatally
infected children born to mothers receiving zidovudine monotherapy
during pregnancy. The Italian Register for HIV Infection in Children
AIDS, 13:927-933, 1999.
40. Kuhn L et al. in Disease
Progression and Early Viral Dynamics in Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Infected Children Exposed to Zidovudine during Prenatal and Perinatal
Periods" (JID. July;182:104-11, 2000.
41. de Souza RS et al. Effect of
prenatal zidovudine on disease progression in perinatally
HIV-1-infected infants. JAIDS. Jun 1;24(2):154-161, 2000.
42. Newschaffer CJ et al. Prenatal
Zidovudine Use and Congenital Anomalies in a Medicaid Population.
JAIDS. Jul 1;24(3):249-256, 2000.
43. Blanche S et al. in
"Persistent mitochondrial dysfunction and perinatal exposure to
antiretroviral nucleoside analogues," Lancet, Sep 25, 1999.
44. UK's Committee on Safety of
Medicines in Perinatal AZT: New warning on potential risk to infants.
www.aidsmap.com. 1999 Jul 21,
http://www.aidsmap.com/namsearch.htm/news/07jul99/story6.htm
45. Olivero OA et al.
3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT) transplacental perfusion kinetics
and DNA incorporation in normal human placentas perfused with AZT.
Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. Jul 16;428(1-2):41-7, 1999.
46. Lorenzi P et al.
Antiretroviral therapies in pregnancy: maternal fetal and neonatal
effects. AIDS. 12:F241-247, 1998.
47. Zietz C et al. An unusual
cluster of cases of Castleman's disease during highly active
antiretroviral therapy for AIDS. NEJM. Jun 17;340:1923-4, 1999.
48. Sussman HE et al. Mutagenicity
of AZT in the human lymphoblastoid cell line, TK6. 2nd National AIDS
Malignancy Conference. 1998.
49. Agarwal RP, Olivero OA.
Genotoxicity and mitochondrial damage in human lymphocytic cells
chronically exposed to 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxythymidine. Mutat Res.
May 23;390(3):223-231, 1997.
50. Lewis W, Dalakas MC.
Mitochondrial toxicity of antiviral drugs. Nat Med. May;1(5):417-22,
1995.
51. Fischl MA et al. Prolonged
zidovudine therapy in patients with AIDS and advanced AIDS-related
complex. JAMA. 262(17):2405-10, 1989.
52. Dournon E et al. Effects of
zidovudine in 365 consecutive patients with AIDS or AIDS-related
complex. Lancet. Dec 3;2:1297-1302, 1988.
53. Mocroft A et al. Anaemia is an
independent predictive marker for clinical prognosis of HIV-infected
patients from across Europe. AIDS. 13:943-50, 1999.
54. Hymes KB et al. The Effect of
Azidothymidine on HIV-related Thrombocytopenia. NEJM. Feb
25;318(8):516-7, 1998.
55. Mir N, Costello C. Zidovudine
and Bone Marrow. Lancet. Nov 19;1195-6, 1988.
56. Dainiak N et al.
3¢-Azido-3¢-deoxythymidine (AZT) inhibits proliferation in vitro
of human haematopoietic progenitor cells. British Journal of
Haematology. 69:299-304, 1988.
57. Gill PS et al. Azidothymidine
Associated with Bone Marrow Failure in the Acquired Immunodeficiency
Syndrome (AIDS). Ann Int Med.107:502-505, 1987.
58. Chariot P, Gherardi R. Partial
cytochrome c oxidase deficiency and cytoplasmic bodies in patients
with zidovudine myopathy. Neuro muscul Disorders.1:357-363, 1991.
59. Coker R et al. Exacerbation of
HIV-associated myopathy by zidovudine. AIDS. 5(2):229-31, 1991.
60. Till M, MacDonnell KB.
Myopathy with Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection:
HIV-1 or zidovudine?. Ann Int Med.;113(7):492-4, 1990.
61. Helbert M et al.
Zidovudine-associated myopathy. Lancet. Sep 17;2:689-90, 1988.
62. Bacellar H et al. Incidence of
clinical AIDS conditions in a cohort of homosexual men with CD4+ cell
counts < 100/cubic mm. JID.170:1284-7, 1994.
63. Chaisson RE, Keruly JC, Moore
RD. Sex, race, drug use and progression of human immunodeficiency
virus disease. NEJM.;333(12):751-6, 1995.
64. Buchbinder S et al. Long-term
HIV-1 infection without immunologic progression. AIDS ;8:1123, 1994.
65. Carr A, Miller J, Law M and
Cooper D A. A syndrome of lipoatrophy, lactic acidaemia and liver
failure dysfunction with HIV nucleoside analogue therapy:
contribution to protease inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy syndrome.
Aids 2000, 14 F25–F32, 2000.
66. HIV Paediatric Prognostic
Markers Collaborative Study. Use of total lymphocyte count for
informing when to start antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected
children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal data. Lancet. Nov
26;366(9500):1868-74, 2005.
67.
Jon Cohen. Gut assumes new role in HIV pathogenesis. Science Vol
307, 4 March, 2005.
68.
Klatzmann et al, Selective tropism of lymphadenopathy associated
virus (LAV) for helper-inducer T lymphocytes. Science 225:59-63,
1984.
69.
Klatzmann,
D. & Montagnier, L. Approaches to AIDS therapy. Nature 319:10-11,
1986.
70. Laurent-Crawford, A. G.,
Krust, B., Muller, S., Rivière, Y., Rey-Cuillé, M.-A., Béhet,
J.-M., Montagnier, L. & Hovanessian, A. G.The Cytopathic Effect
of HIV is Associated with Apoptosis. Virol. 185:829-839, 1991.
71. Ameisen, J. & Capron, A.
Cell dysfunction and depletion in AIDS: the programmed cell death
hypothesis. Immunol. Today 12:102-105, 1991.
72. DAIDS official "HIV"
culturing manual, under quality control, Section VI, page 45, 1997.
73.Barbaro G. HIV infection and
the cardiovascular system part I the pre-HAART era; HIV AIDS Rev,; 3
(1): 5-13, 2004.
74. Scevola et al. Guidelines for
the prevention of cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients
treated with antiretroviral drugs. HIV AIDS Rev; 3 (1): 21-28, 2004.
75. Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E.,
Turner, V. F. & Papdimitriou, J. M. Oxidative Stress, HIV and
AIDS. Res. Immunol. 143:145-148, 1992b.
76. Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E., A
Mitotic Theory. J. Theor. Biol. 96:741-758, 1982.
77. Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E.
Reappraisal of AIDS: Is the oxidation caused by the risk factors the
primary cause? Med. Hypotheses 25:151-162, 1988.
78. Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos,
Valendar F.Turner,John M. Papadimitriou, et al. A critical analysis
of the HIV-T4-Cell-AIDS hypothesis. Genetica
95: 5-24, 1995.
79. Zagury, D., Bernard, J.,
Leonard, R., Cheynier, R., Feldman, M., Sarin, P. S. & Gallo, R.
C. Long-Term Cultures of HTLV-III-Infected T Cells: A Model of
Cytopathology of T-Cell Depletion in AIDS. Science 231:850-853, 1986.
80. Bess JW Jr, Gorelick RJ,
Bosche WJ, Henderson LE, Arthur LO. Microvesicles are a source of
contaminating cellular proteins found in purified HIV-1 preparations.
Virology, Mar 31; 230(1):134-44, 1997.
81. Horwitz MS, Boyce-Jacino MT,
Faras AJ. Novel human endogenous sequences related to human
immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. Apr;66(4):2170-9, 1992.
82. McClure MA, Richardson HS,
Clinton RA, Hepp CM, Crowther BA, Donaldson EF.
Automated characterization of
potentially active retroid agents in the human genome. Genomics.
Apr;85(4):512-23, 2005.
83. Gallo and others, Science, Vol
303 16 January, 2004.
84. Hoxie et al., Persistant
noncytopathic infection of normal human T ymphocytes with
AIDS-associated retrovirus. Science 229 (4720): 1400, 1985.
85. Flosie Wong-Staal & Robert
C. Gallo. Nature Vol 317, 3 Oct 1985.
86. Papadopulos-Eleopulos E,
Turner VF, Papadimitriou J, Page B, Causer D, Alfonso H, Mhlongo S,
Miller T, Maniotis A, Fiala C. A critique of the Montagnier evidence
for the HIV/AIDS hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 63(4):597-601, 2004.
87. Board KF, et al.,Experimental
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in simian immunodeficiency
virus-infected rhesus macaques. J
Infect Dis. 2003 Feb 15;187(4):576-88. Epub Feb 7, 2003.
88. Stolberg, G. For
Retired Chimps, a Life of Leisure, New York Times, January 7, 2003.
89. Maniotis A., Folberg R., Hess A., Seftor E., Gardner
L., Pe'er J., Trent J., Meltzer P., Hendrix M. Vascular channel
formation by human uveal melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro:
Vasculogenic mimicry. Amer. J. Path. Vol. I55, No 3, pps. 739-752,
September,1999.
90. Maniotis A, Chen X, Garcia C, DeChristopher PJ, Wu
D, Pe'er J, Folberg R. Control of Melanoma Morphogenesis Endothelial
Survival, and Perfusion By Extracellular Matrix. Lab Investigation.
Vol. 82 No. 8 p.1083-1092, 2002.
91. Kazuo Shirakawa, Hitoshi
Tsuda, Yuji Heike, Kazunori Kato, Rumiko Asada, Motoko Inomata,
Hiroki Sasaki,Fujio Kasumi, Masataka Yoshimoto, Toshihiko Iwanaga,
Fumio Konishi, Masaaki Terada, and Hiro Wakasugi. Absence of
Endothelial Cells, Central Necrosis, and Fibrosis Are Associated with
Aggressive Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Cancer Research 61, 445–451,
January 15, 2001.
92.Shirakawa K, Kobayashi H, Heike Y, Kawamoto S,
Brechbiel MW, Kasumi F,Iwanaga T, Konishi F, Terada M, Wakasugi
H. Hemodynamics in Vasculogenic Mimicry and Angiogenesis of
Inflammatory Breast Cancer Xenograft. Cancer Research 62, 560-566,
January 15, 2002.
93. Clarijs R. Otte-Holler I, Ruiter, de Waal MW.
Presence of a fluid-conduting meshwork in xenografted cutaneous and
primary human uveal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and
Visual Science: Vol. 43 No 4 2002.
94. Passalidou E, Trivella M, N Ferguson SM, Jhu AC,
Granone P, Nicholson AG, Ratcliffe C, Tetlow M, Leigh I,
Harris AL , Gatter KC, Pezzella F. Vascular phenotype in angiogenic
and non-angiogenic lung non-small cell carcinomas. British Journal of
Cancer 86, 244 - 249. 2002.
95.Thies A, Mangold U , Mol I, and Schumaker U.
PAS-positive loops and networks as a prognostic indicator in
cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Pathol 195 :537 -542, 2002.
96. Maniotis AJ, Valyi-Nagy K,
Karavitis J, Moses J, Boddipali V, Wang Y, Nunez R, Setty S, Arbieva
Z, Bissell MJ, Folberg R. Chromatin organization measured by AluI
restriction enzyme changes with malignancy and is regulated by the
extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Am J Pathol.
Apr;166(4):1187-203, 2005.
97. Harrison JJ, Turner RJ,
Marques LLR, Ceri H. Biofilms. A new understanding of these microbial
communities is driving a revolution that may transform the science of
microbiology. American Scientist, 508-515, 2005.
98. Strandstrom et al. Studies
with canine sera that contain antibodies which recognize human
immunodeficiency virus structural proteins. Cancer Res 1990 Sep 1;50
17 Suppl :5628S-5630S.
99. Willman et al., Heterophile
Antibodies to Bovine and Caprine Proteins Causing False-Positive
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Other Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assay Results. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory
Immunology, p. 615-616, Vol. 6, No. 4, July 1999.
100. Dura WT, Wozniewicz BM.
Expression of antigens homologous to human retrovirus molecules in
normal and severely atrophic thymus. Thymus.;22(4):245-54, 1994.
101. Pasteur Institute interview with Professor Luc
Montagnier, July 18th, 1997, Continuum 1998: 5:30-34,
available at website http://theperthgroup.com
102. de Harven E,. Pioneer
deplores "HIV". Continuum vol 5, page 24, 1998.
103. Josephson et al .
Investigation of Atypical Western Blot (immunoblot) Reactivities
Involving Core Proteins of Human Immunodifficiency Virus Type I.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, p, 932-937 May 1989.
104. Abbott's
package insert, 1997
105. Epitope's
package insert, 1997.
106. Roche's package insert,
1996.
107. Financial News Press Release,
Source: Calypte Biomedical Corporation, Calypte Biomedical Presents
Results of Its Rapid HIV-1/2 Field Trial Tests at the XV 2004
International AIDS Conference in Bangkok.
108. John Bulloch. AIDS Home Test
Kit Called Deceptive. Wall Street Journal, June 9th,
2004):
109. Defer et al. Multicentre
quality control of polymerase chain reaction [viral load] for
detection of HIV DNA. AIDS 6: 659-663, 1992.
110. Busch et al.,The Transfusion
Safety Study Group. Poor sensitivity, specificity, and
reproducibility of detection of HIV-1 DNA in serum by polymerase
chain reaction J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 5 (9):872, 1992.
111. Stramer et. al. Detection of
HIV-1 and HCV Infections among Antibody-Negative Blood Donors by
Nucleic Acid–Amplification Testing New England Journal of Medicine,
Volume 351:760-768; August 19, Number 8, 2004.
112. Pilcher et al., Detection of
Acute Infections during HIV Testing in North Carolina. The New
England Journal of Medicine, Volume 352:1873-1883, Number 18, May 5,
2005):
113. Popovic, M., Sarngadharan, M.
G. & Read, E.,. Detection, Isolation,and Continuous Production of
Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and
Pre-AIDS. Science 224:497-500, 1984.
114.
Rubinstein, E., The Untold Story of HUT78: a cell line established
from a patient with mature T4-cell leukaemia. Science
248:1499-1507,1990.
115.
Gazdar, A. F., et al. Mitogen Requirements for the In Vitro
Propagation of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas. Blood 55:409-417, 1980.
116.
Gallo, R. C., Sarin, P. S., Kramarsky, B., Salahuddin, Z., Markham,
P.,Popovic, M. First isolation of HTLV-III. Nature 321:119, 1986.
117. Poiesz, B., et al. T-cell
lines established from human T-lymphocytic neoplasias by direct
response to T-cell growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acac. Sci.
77:6815-6819, 1980.
118. Sylwester A, Wessels D,
Anderson SA, Warren RQ, Shutt DC, Kennedy RC, Soll DR. HIV-induced
syncytia of a T cell line form single giant pseudopods and are
motile. J Cell Sci. 1993 Nov;106 ( Pt 3):941-53.
119. Schuurman HJ, Krone WJ,
Broekhuizen R, van Baarlen J, van Veen P, Golstein AL,
Huber J, Goudsmit J. The thymus in
acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Comparison with other types of
immunodeficiency diseases, and presence of components of human
immunodeficiency virus type 1. Am J Pathol. Jun;134(6):1329-38, 1989.
120. Skopinska-Rozewska E,
Moscicka-Wesolowska M, Wasiutynski A, Maldyk J, Malejczyk M, Pazdur
J. Lymphatic system of mice born from mothers treated with ampicillin
or cloxacillin during gestation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)
34(2):203-8, 1986).
121. Yawalkar et al. T cells
isolated from positive epicutaneous test reactions to amoxicillin and
ceftriaxone are drug specific and cytotoxic. J Invest Dermatol.
(Oct;115(4):647-52), 2000.
122. Harris L. Coulter,
Divided Legacy, North Atlantic Books, 1994.
123. Parent et al. In vitro
lymphocyte-differentiating effects of thymulin (Zn-FTS) on lymphocyte
subpopulation of severely malnourished children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
60(2):274-8, 1994.
124. Chevalier et al. Immune
recovery of malnourished children takes longer than nutritional
recovery: implications for treatment and discharge. J. Trop Pediatr
44(5):304-7, 1998.
125. Wafaie W. Fawzi,M.B., B.S.,
Dr.P.H., Gernard I. Msamanga, M.D., Sc.D., Donna Spiegelman, Sc.D.,
Ruilan Wei, Ph.D., Saidi Kapiga, M.D., Sc.D., Eduardo Villamor, M.D.,
Dr.P.H., Davis Mwakagile, M.D., M.Med., Ferdinand Mugusi, M.D.,
M.Med., Ellen Hertzmark, M.A., Max Essex, D.V.M., Ph.D., and David J.
Hunter, M.B., B.S., Sc.D. A Randomized Trial of Multivitamin
Supplements and HIV Disease Progression and Mortality Volume
351:23-32, July 1, Number 1, 2004.
126. Mortimer P et al. Towards
error free HIVdiagnosis. Public Health
Laboratory Service, UK. 1992.
|
|